Before we get into it, just a quick service announcement:
Joe M, aka @StormIsUponUs, along with his wife, @BeThePlan, have been banned from Twitter. Also banned today (for the 2nd time, I believe), was @Western2A.
You can find both on Gab at:
This is just going to keep happening more and more, guys. Q said it again himself, recently:
We’re just going to see more and more of /ourguys/ yeeted and deleted from the Cabal-controlled platforms like Twitter, so honestly, I’m going to keep saying what I’ve been saying since the beginning. The only real way to fight this is to have a platform that is completely out of their reach; that is totally beyond their control. Gab has been through the crucible, and come out stronger each time, and the Q-community is only growing there.
I would advise everyone to sign up for Gab if they haven’t already. Some email providers (I believe Yahoo, and sometimes Gmail) censor messages from Gab, so you’re going to have to use a better email provider (like Protonmail or something) to get an account, and give these guys a follow.
You can find links to a bunch of people already established on Gab through my Connect Page.
Okay, on to the article:
There are a number of big questions I have for #QAnon as a result of his three years of posting, some of which I’ve addressed before here on the site. But today, I want to focus in on a recurring line Q has said over, and over, and dive into what I think it may actually portend for the future of this movement.
It’s going to be BIBLICAL!
I’ve wondered for a long time what this could possibly mean, in terms of actual, real-world impact. Certainly, we all pretty much know the “Great Awakening” itself is a call back to the four previous “Great Awakenings” in American history; those periods of great Christian revival that swept through the nation. Q himself has, many times, quoted scripture, and also buried in this all is the imagery of “The Storm” – which harkens back to the biblical account of Noah and the first great Deluge.
Likewise, we’ve seen many staggering events in recent times, such as swarms of locust flying across the Middle East, and now, a “plague” of seemingly Biblical proportions in the form of the Corona Virus.
So is Q simply alluding to the size and immensity of the movement, when it reaches its final form?
Surely that’s part of it.
But I don’t think that’s the full story.
And I think if we tug on a particular thread, the full story will begin to better come into focus.
So let’s start with something Q has talked about several times now, beginning with “The Bloodlines.”
We’ve talked about the #Bloodlines here on this site before, and I think most of my readers will now be familiar with the book “Bloodlines of the Illuminati” by Fritz Springmeier. (Just search “Bloodlines of the Illuminati” in the sidebar, and you’ll get several articles related to the subject, in case you’re unfamiliar). But the basic gist is that there is a hierarchy containing quite a number of bloodlines out there that think they’re super special for one reason or another, and that because of this inherent superiority, they’re entitled to rule over humanity.
Major bloodlines are the Payseurs, and Rothschilds; Springmeier lays out a bunch more in his book:
- The Astor Bloodline
- The Bundy Bloodline
- The Collins Bloodline
- The DuPont Bloodline
- The Freeman Bloodline
- The Kennedy Bloodline
- The Li Bloodline
- The Onassis Bloodline
- The Reynolds Bloodline
- The Rockefeller Bloodline
- The Russell Bloodline
- The Van Duyn Bloodline
(Though there aren’t just 13, as is commonly held, and in fact, there’s a lot more than 13).
Some of these Bloodlines (though not all) claim to hail from the earlier Merovingian bloodline, which as I note in my book, claims to hail back even earlier to Egyptian royalty. (I then go back even further, and attempt to connect this to an actual, antediluvian Atlantis, which, while it may sound quite outlandish here in one line on your computer screen, believe me when I say there’s much more evidence supporting the theory than might be evident at first glance, and which I attempt to make the case for in my book). But that’s somewhat tangential, save to provide some essential context for what’s to come. To get back to the immediate topic at hand, at one point we have Q, in drop 142, asking us how Soros replaced the Rockefeller bloodline… implying that Bloodlines can be replaced.
And to answer Q’s question… if I had to guess…. Soros was married to Susan Weber at the time. Weber may be part of a distant bloodline, given her heritage – but that’s pure, unbridled speculation, and I may be completely wrong on that point, so please, don’t take it as gospel. But if I had to guess, I think it might be similar to Hilton marrying into the Rothschild line, as shown above in droo 3159.
Many speculated at the time these were originally dropped that the Cabal was actively looking for Bloodline members who may not know they are actually Bloodline, by searching for some kind of common genetic marker shared by every member of the Bloodline.
But what could this marker be, exactly?
That, friends, is where I think things get Biblical.
There’s a lingering question within the Corpus of Q about what the N in NWO stands for. I originally wrote in my book that I considered two major possibilities; that N could stand either for NHSH (pronounced Nahash), the name of the serpent in Eden (and thus, be an allusion to the Brotherhood of the Snake, as recalled by Plutarch, when conveying ancient Egyptian (and thus Atlantean) rituals as part of this secret order)…
Or, that it could be a reference to Nephilim; a possibility I largely dismissed at the time.
I’d like to temper that point now, after much research. I now take much more seriously the idea that the N could stand for Nephilim, and that this Brotherhood of the Snake, mentioned by Plutarch and Blavatsky, may have very well been serving these creatures, perpetuating a system of worship that kept them enthroned and in power… but I’m getting a bit ahead of myself here.
What follows owes a debt of gratitude to the book The Unseen Realm by Dr. Michael Heiser. I highly recommend anyone who even has a passing interest in the subject pick up the book, because it is the most authoritative and well researched book I’ve seen on this subject (while still remaining accessible), so much so that you’ll never see your Bible the same way again.
So what is a Nephilim, exactly?
Well, a Nephilim is an Apkallu.
Okay cool, we can all go home now.
This is an example of a Nephilim/Apkallu:
Looks like a dude in a fish costume holding a purse and (in other images) a pine cone. And you wouldn’t be too far off with that observation. Nephilim/Apkallu were basically demi-gods in ancient Mesopotamia – a common thread found in many cultures of the Near East.
And yes, many have noticed the similarities to the robes worn by Popes:
But to fully understand the Apkallu, we need to get into an ancient Mesopotamian literature state-of-mind. We’re going to talk about the Nephilim first, and then the Apkallu (even though they’re the same thing)… but before we even attempt that, we have to understand another type of being which predates both:
Wait, Elohim? Isn’t that just another name for the God of the Bible?
The issue is much more tangled than some might realize at first glance, and many things get lost in translation over the years. (And keep in mind, I’m going to be skimming and compressing here, so seriously, pick up Heiser’s book if you want a complete and thorough exploration of the subject at hand).
Basically, there’s more than one Elohim in the Bible, and YHWY (the Jewish name for God) is the head of them all. In fact, he has something Heiser refers to as the “Divine Council” – which we see alluded to throughout scripture, such as when, in Genesis 1:26, God says:
“And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.”
“Let us.” Plural.
Now, the modern, Western mind might conceive of that as the Trinity simply speaking to itself, but this simply isn’t true – especially given the time period in which it was written, wherein there was no conception of the Trinity at all.
This is God speaking to the Divine Council; the “Sons of God,” other Elohim.
Later, after the fall of Man, God does it again, in Chapter 3, verse 22:
Then the Lord God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he put out his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever”—
“Behold, the man has become like one of Us…”
Is God just prone to using the “Royal We” like some kind of pretentious celebrity? Not at all. If you go back to the original texts, its quite clear he’s speaking to other beings – other Elohim.
But I can hear the objections already: How do we know he’s not talking to, for instance, Angels?
Well, he very well could be, but it’s important to remember that ἄγγελος (angelos) is a title for a role – that of a messenger of YHWH – not a classification of being. Just like a human being can be a mailman, but not all humans are mailmen, an elohim can be an angel, but not all elohim are angels. And the term angelos only comes from the Greek Septuagint. In the original Hebrew texts, the word was malʼākh – and again, it just implied a job, a role, a title – not a category of being.
Another instance we can clearly see the Divine Council at work is in Job – a book which most scholars think probably predates Genesis – wherein we actually see a meeting of the Divine Council itself:
Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them.
And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it.
And the LORD said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth God, and escheweth evil?
— Job 1: 6-8
This is a scene which has confused many Christians for a very long time, because many assume that Satan is the big, bad devil; evil incarnate which was cast down from Heaven… but here he is, in the Divine Council, speaking directly to God, with God offering up a man to him.
See, this is a more ancient understanding of the Divine Council at work here. “Satan,” at least when Job was written, was not so much a name as a ROLE a particular being played on the Council – that of the Accuser. So just like Angels were the messengers of God, the elohim taking on the role of the Satan had a specific function in the Divine Council, which carried out the will of YHWH.
So this scene which probably textually predates Genesis itself, shows the Satan doing his job.
And we all know the story in Genesis of the fall of man, where the serpent – the NHSH – an Elohim himself – causes mankind to fall and get cast out of the garden of Eden. Many just simply assume that the NHSH is equal to Satan who is equal to Lucifer who is equal to Beelzebub, who is equal to Azazel (to whom, the Israelites would offer the scapegoat) and so on – though there isn’t any textual evidence for that in the passage itself.
In fact, what you see here are the first inklings of a divine rebellion in heaven, with Elohim betraying YHWH, and attempting to subvert his creation.
But what happens next seems to surprise even YHWH himself (inasmuch as an all-knowing creator can be “surprised” by anything):
Now it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born to them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves of all whom they chose.
And the Lord said, “My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, for he is indeed flesh; yet his days shall be one hundred and twenty years.” There were giants on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.
— Genesis 6:1–4
Yup, you read that right. The rebellious Elohim became incarnate and slept with women, which produced a hybrid race called “Nephilim.”
Now, hold up, you may be thinking. This is in my Bible?
Why yes, yes it is. Some people may be having a hard time processing this reality, because it’s odd to think of divine beings as taking on bodies, let alone physically reproducing with humans, but this is, in fact, the Biblical narrative. What’s more, is that if you call yourself a Christian, foundational to your faith is the idea that God, the chief of all Elohim, became incarnate himself.
So if YHWY, an Elohim, can take on flesh in the form of Jesus… why couldn’t the other Elohim also take on flesh?
The text clearly says they did, and it’s only in this light that the subsequent narratives make any sense.
And they would become a problem throughout the Israelite conquest narrative that unfolds from Exodus, onward.
Then Caleb quieted the people before Moses, and said, “Let us go up at once and take possession, for we are well able to overcome it.”
But the men who had gone up with him said, “We are not able to go up against the people, for they are stronger than we.” And they gave the children of Israel a bad report of the land which they had spied out, saying, “The land through which we have gone as spies is a land that devours its inhabitants, and all the people whom we saw in it are men of great stature. There we saw the giants (the descendants of Anak came from the giants); and we were like grasshoppers in our own sight, and so we were in their sight.”
— Numbers 13: 30-33
Worth noting here before going further – and I go over this in my book – the term “Giants” here comes from the Greek term “Gigantes” – which were basically just demigod warriors. Big guys, no doubt, but not particularly gigantic. Think Shaq at a time when most men were 5 feet tall due to poor nutrition and the like. But the demigod connection is the one the Biblical writers wanted to underscore, when translating the original Hebrew term “Nephilim” into Koine Greek. The primarily Greco-Roman audience at the time would have understood this connection, and the implications.
(So please oh please oh please don’t flood my comments with photos of photoshopped “giants” and misidentified skeletal remains).
And Anak in this passage was the father of the Anakim, who later became the Rephaim (I have to assume here, as the bloodlines were “watered down” by more and more human interbreeding) – which itself tied into to the Ugaritic Cult of the Dead – basically a cult revolving around the worship of dead Nephilim kings – actually, Demons – which I’ll address in a bit – who resided in what’s now modern day Syria and the surrounding regions (again, a vast oversimplification for expediency’s sake).
Point is – and I am condensing here, so get Heiser’s book for the full exposition – what happened in the divine rebellion started by the NHSH is that many of the other Elohim tried to usurp God’s creation for themselves, installed themselves as “gods” over “the nations” and even had hybrid-human offspring of their own which helped bolster these illegitimate hierarchies and kingdoms.
It’s something of a talking point of the “Nu-Atheists” to say that the God of the old testament is violent and bloody and cruel, when examining these conquest narratives, but this just shows how much they’ve missed the point of the text. When Israel marches up from Egypt and begins their conquest of the surrounding territories, they fight against these foreign gods (the illegitimate Elohim who have usurped God’s creation for themselves, and who demand things like blood sacrifice), the Nephilim rulers, and their servants. God made the earth to be his kingdom; not to be stolen by the rebellious Elohim. So to address this, the plan God had in mind was to always reclaim the entire earth, and he would do so starting with his own Kingdom; his own chosen people – the Jewish people.
The explicit goal of all this was to conquer the territories that were now under the dominion of false powers, and bring humankind back into God’s Kingdom, as it was established, territory by territory, on planet earth.
It’s why you see, with Israelite kings, narratives like David and Goliath – who many scholars claim was actually a Rephaim himself, along with his brothers – each of whom is noted as being a “giant” before they are all killed by the Israelites.
But ultimately, Israel would fail in this task to bring God’s Kingdom to the nations. And each time they failed, they would be brought under the dominion of these foreign gods, these rebellious Elohim – most notably, during both the Egyptian and Babylonian captivity – the latter being when much of the Old Testament itself was written.
And it’s here, having understood Elohim and Nephilim, that I now turn back to the term Apkallu.
You’ve undoubtedly heard the phrase that “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.”
It’s much the same with the Apkallu, for though they were villainous abominations to the Israelites, they were veritable heroes and demigods to the Babylonians. And according to Babylonian tradition, Gilgamesh (aka Nimrod), was referred to as the “Master of Apkallu” – and that these Apkallu were “Seven Sages” who lived before the time of the great flood, and who are credited with supposedly laying the foundations of the city of Uruk – a pre-Babylonian city most scholars think was founded around the year 5,000 – but which could easily have its history extend back into the time of Gobleki Tepe, some 5,000 years prior (which personally, I tend to think was an Atlantean colony – but that’s just pure speculation on my part).
This kind of role for the Apkallu is consistent with the description we see of Azazel (the entity we see the Israelites offering the scapegoat to, all throughout the Old Testament) in the Book of Enoch, imparting to humans knowledge which they are not ready to handle:
And Azazel taught men to make swords and knives and shields and breastplates; and made known to them the metals [of the earth] and the art of working them; and bracelets and ornaments; and the use of antimony and the beautifying of the eyelids; and all kinds of costly stones and all colouring tinctures. And there arose much godlessness, and they committed fornication, and they were led astray and became corrupt in all their ways.
— Book of Enoch 8:1–3a
Now, the book of Enoch is an interesting subject, because by and large in the West, it’s been all but completely forgotten; tossed on top of a pile of texts most might call “Apocryphal” and rarely read or understood by most Christians because it’s been relegated to the ash heap of history by various authority figures through the ages.
But Jesus himself pulled many quotes from it, as did the Apostles. (In truth, that’s probably the only thing that’s kept it around and preserved for so long).
Enoch, you might recall, was Noah’s ancestor, and we first learn about him in Genesis 5: 21-24:
Enoch lived sixty-five years, and begot Methuselah. After he begot Methuselah, Enoch walked with God three hundred years, and had sons and daughters. So all the days of Enoch were three hundred and sixty-five years. And Enoch walked with God; and he was not, for God took him.
“Walked” here is the same verb you find in the opening chapters of Genesis, where God walked with Adam and Eve in the Garden. Tradition ascribes the Book of Enoch to Enoch, and concerns itself mainly with “The Watchers” – Angelic Elohim who were tasked with watching over humanity, following the fall.
Instead of shepherding them, as instructed, the Watchers began to lust after the humans, they then take on flesh, and reproduce with them, and this gives rise to the hybrid race of the Nephilim, before enthroning themselves as rulers over humanity.
There are over 200 Watchers named in the book of Enoch, all with different areas of knowledge which they impart to humanity in their quest to debase them. Azazel is mentioned here, along with many others, who teach humanity everything from astrology to cosmetics and beyond.
What warrants a few verses in Genesis gets a whole plot in Enoch:
And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters. 2. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: ‘Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men and beget us children.’ 3. And Semjâzâ, who was their leader, said unto them: ‘I fear ye will not indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.’ 4. And they all answered him and said: ‘Let us all swear an oath, and all bind ourselves by mutual imprecations not to abandon this plan but to do this thing.’ 5. Then sware they all together and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. 6. And they were in all two hundred; who descended ⌈in the days⌉ of Jared on the summit of Mount Hermon, and they called it Mount Hermon, because they had sworn and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. 7. And these are the names of their leaders: Sêmîazâz, their leader, Arâkîba, Râmêêl, Kôkabîêl, Tâmîêl, Râmîêl, Dânêl, Êzêqêêl, Barâqîjâl, Asâêl, Armârôs, Batârêl, Anânêl, Zaqîêl, Samsâpêêl, Satarêl, Tûrêl, Jômjâêl, Sariêl. 8. These are their chiefs of tens.
And all the others together with them took unto themselves wives, and each chose for himself one, and they began to go in unto them and to defile themselves with them, and they taught them charms and enchantments, and the cutting of roots, and made them acquainted with plants. 2. And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells: 3. Who consumed all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, 4. the giants turned against them and devoured mankind. 5. And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish, and to devour one another’s flesh, and drink the blood. 6. Then the earth laid accusation against the lawless ones.
— Book of Enoch 6 – 7
Here we even see the beginning of cannibalism, as this hybrid race was seemingly insatiable.
And you have to understand the implication of this all in light of the narrative of the two trees in the garden – the Tree of Life, and the Tree of the KNOWLEDGE of Good and Evil.
Humanity ate from the latter before they were supposed to. It’s not that God was banning them from eating from it forever; it was that they, in their early state, were not ready for it. Knowledge isn’t evil, in and of itself. It’s the misapplication of knowledge that turns men’s deeds evil. So in these “Watchers,” these “Elohim,” these “Sons of God” actively giving men knowledge, they weren’t doing them any favors. They were accelerating their downfall by giving them that which they could not yet bear responsibly – essentially using them as pawns in some kind of supernatural power grab.
Here we expand chapter 8, to see all the different areas in which the Watchers, the Nephilim, were tampering:
And Azâzêl taught men to make swords, and knives, and shields, and breastplates, and made known to them the metals 〈of the earth〉 and the art of working them, and bracelets, and ornaments, and the use of antimony, and the beautifying of the eyelids, and all kinds of costly stones, and all colouring tinctures. 2. And there arose much godlessness, and they committed fornication, and they were led astray, and became corrupt in all their ways. Semjâzâ taught enchantments, and root-cuttings, Armârôs the resolving of enchantments, Barâqîjâl, (taught) astrology, Kôkabêl the constellations, Ezêqêêl the knowledge of the clouds, 〈Araqiêl the signs of the earth, Shamsiêl the signs of the sun〉, and Sariêl the course of the moon. And as men perished, they cried, and their cry went up to heaven . . .
— Book of Enoch 8
And you’ll recall that in the Genesis narrative, God prevents mankind from eating from the Tree of Life, and to effectively do so, casts them out of Eden entirely.
Well… ancient Babylonian Apkallu were supposedly attending to the Tree of Life, using the pine cone (a symbol we’ve seen everywhere) to dip into bags of pollen and pollinate the tree. Robert Sepeher delves into the symbolism in-depth in this video:
I have to speculate here that what the Apkallu were trying to teach man was more than just mere metallurgy and makeup.
I think it’s safe to say they were trying to teach man how to become immortal; minus God’s help. (Or, at the very least, making promises along those lines).
Later, in chapter 9, those Elohim who were still loyal to YHWH, Michael, Uriel, Raphael, and Gabriel, would see all the suffering on the planet, go to YHWH, and basically ask him to do something about it.
And that’s when YHWH decides to have the Watchers bound and tossed in a place called Dûdâêl – which is actually east of Jerusalem, and it’s basically the equivalent of what we might call Tartarus – an underworld prison for these fallen ones. The binding is Raphael’s job. He also instructs Gabriel to make the descendants, the Nephilim, slaughter each other in battle,
Yes, this is a foreign concept to moderns, but often ancient literature has a geography to it. I’m reminded of the passage in scripture where Jesus tells his disciples that the gates of hell would not prevail against his church, while they were in Caesarea Philippi – which was a hub for ancient Ba’al worship, and had a grotto/passage that was considered a literal entrance to the underworld, and which was called “the gates of hell.” It’s a foreign concept to us moderns for seemingly ephemeral concepts to have tangible geography, but that was the intention of those writing/saying these things.
Judgement would fall on the Watchers, and they would be condemned by God, even though they begged for mercy. And… this is where things get (perhaps) even stranger, because we’re informed in chapter 15 that evil spirits – what we would call “Demons” – are actually the spirits of the dead members of that hybrid race we call Nephilim, and not the fallen angels many would presume.
And now, the giants, who are produced from the spirits and flesh, shall be called evil spirits upon the earth, and on the earth shall be their dwelling. 9. Evil spirits have proceeded from their bodies; because they are born from men, ⌈⌈and⌉⌉ from the holy Watchers is their beginning and primal origin; ⌈they shall be evil spirits on earth, and⌉ evil spirits shall they be called. [10. As for the spirits of heaven, in heaven shall be their dwelling, but as for the spirits of the earth which were born upon the earth, on the earth shall be their dwelling.] 11. And the spirits of the giants afflict, oppress, destroy, attack, do battle, and work destruction on the earth, and cause trouble: they take no food, ⌈but nevertheless hunger⌉ and thirst, and cause offences. And these spirits shall rise up against the children of men and against the women, because they have proceeded ⌈from them⌉.
— Book of Enoch 15: 8-11
And again; most of these would die before/during the Flood, but not all. Vestiges still lingered (thus, the Old Testament conquest narratives). And more and more, I’m thinking that this is precisely what is lingering still, today.
So now I’m going to go where Heiser doesn’t, and propose that these ancient Pagan religions you see around the world, from Egypt, to Babylon, and beyond – these are all systems of literal Demonic worship, and that the “bloodlines” we hear so much about are actually Nephilim bloodlines; that they pledge allegiance to perpetuating these systems. They bear specific genetic markets (as alluded to by Q with the 23andMe posts), and engage in certain Satanic practices in order to “strengthen” their bloodlines (because normally, these bloodlines would become more and more diluted over time and interbreeding with humans). This is why, I think, the moonchild ritual is particularly important. Recall that in a moonchild ritual, they are trying to become possessed before/during sex. And recall that possession, given what is said in Enoch, is really allowing the spirit of a dead Nephilim to take over your body. Seeing that the Watchers are all imprisoned, there’s no way to make “new” Nephilim, so this strikes me as the next “best” thing for this Cabal.
Beyond that, even just recall for a moment the Exodus narrative and the 10 plagues experienced by Egypt. It’s pretty common knowledge that each of the plagues correlates to an Egyptian deity (read: Watchers and their Demonic descendants) – thus, YHWH shows his superiority over all these other Fallen by basically wrecking their faces and commanding what they supposedly have total control over.
God dismantles the entire Egyptian Pantheon – these illegitimate Gods who had tried to usurp the Earth, nation by nation, and the end result of it all is freedom for his people.
Unfortunately, the legacy of these divine rebels still carries on into the modern day, seemingly carried on by their unholy bastard descendants.
However, if mankind knew what they were up to; if they were all awake to who they are, and what their practices were, well…
It’s not wonder Q tells us that the thing they fear the most is an awakened public, likening Anons themselves as one of the very plagues which helped bring them down so long ago:
Hey guys, thanks for reading today. Hopefully you gleaned something useful and deepened your understanding with this article. That’s something I strive to do with everything I publish, so if you haven’t had a chance to pick up and read my book yet, I highly encourage you to do so. The reviews have been stellar, honestly, I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard now that people have bought two or more copies, and given them to friends or family, only to have that person come back to them later, completely redpilled and awake. And that’s really the goal with the book. This Q-stuff gets deep and intense, and it’s really an aid to help awaken those we love and care about, because – especially if the article I wrote above is correct – we really are in for the fight of our lives here.
Anyway, again, thank you for reading, and if you want to pick up a copy of Revolution Q for yourself, it’s available both in a physical edition and Kindle edition over on Amazon! Just click the link below: