Guest Post: Inside the Migration Deep State – by Chris Deliso #QAnon #GreatAwakening #NEONREVOLT

Guest Post: Inside the Migration Deep State – by Chris Deliso #QAnon #GreatAwakening #NEONREVOLT

Hi guys,

NEON here. Today, we’re doing something a bit different; something I’ve never done here before on the site, and that’s featuring the work of a guest researcher!

This article was written by Chris Deliso, who is a fantastic researcher in his own right. Having graduated from Oxford with a background in Byzantine Studies, Chris offers a distinct perspective, often writing about European political affairs on his own site, http://chrisdeliso.com/. And as you’ll find out in this article, Chris was invited to speak at the Defense Intelligence Agency when Gen. Flynn was director there, so if Flynn thinks he’s worth listening to, so do I! And today, he’s compiled a ton of great research which I hope will serve as a major launch pad for further digging – all regarding the Cabal’s International Human Trafficking operation otherwise known as “Mass Migration.”

Chris can also be found at @ChrisDeliso on Gab, and at @RealChrisDeliso on Twitter, and it’s a real privilege to get to feature his work today.

I found this article to be tremendously insightful. The scope of it all should astonish you.

As Chris says below:

I reckon 99 percent of the American public has probably never heard of any of these conventions, summits and agencies.

This ignorance makes it incredibly easy for the globalist elite to systematically carry out their plans.

I hope all will all benefit from reading what Chris has to say today, and of course, we want to thank Chris for doing all the hard work and heavy lifting of piecing all this tremendous information together for our benefit, here today.

-NEON


Inside the Migration #DeepState – Context for Anons to Explore

By Chris Deliso

I’m taking a break from my regular research today to write this article because – well, we need more eyes on.

The information that follows provides a specific context for events happening now in your local community (and country)… because the evidence of the Cabal’s global rule is always local. As Walter Sobchak put it: ‘This affects all of us, man!

The migration deep state – vast, powerful, well-hidden in plain sight – can seem futile to take on. Still, at very least this monstrosity has to be analyzed, not just because of short-term events like President Trump’s 2020 re-election, but because it will affect the world your children inherit.

In 17 years of reporting from Europe, I’ve encountered many persons and organizations involved in what I’ve dubbed the humanitarian-development complex; the migration deep state is a sub-sector of this. From corruption and cover-ups in UN-run Kosovo and EU stealth legislation, to international NGO slush funds and anarchists fighting to break borders for ‘refugee rights,’ I’ve seen some things. When I was asked to speak for the Defense Intelligence Agency at the Pentagon in September 2014, to share some insights on security risks in Southeast Europe, the migration crisis had not fully materialized. But it was among my predicted threats (all of which, unfortunately, materialized within the following nine months).

I have plenty of vignettes to share, but another time. Today is about the 30,000-foot view, about tracing the contours of a super-structure, so that anons can understand seemingly unconnected events and research details within a context.

First, there is one rule to remember. The global elites running this industry do not want to solve problems: they want to manage problems.

Because… that’s where the money is.

Other people’s money. Massive sums of money that can be safely allocated on long-term projects, self-perpetuating grant cycles, philanthropic experiments and more- all leading towards the steady and relentless expansion of processes, bureaucracies and programs, all of which require… more money. It is globalist vampirism at its worst, and often, undetectable.

When I started followed #QAnon in late 2017 and thereafter, it was very interesting (and encouraging) to see the emphasis that Q, and thus the Trump Administration, was putting on illegal immigration and the related risk factors. Various Q drops have pointed to important issues like the use of MS-13 by the Cabal, the importance of the Wall not only as a physical but mental deterrent, and the Democratic Party’s reliance on open-borders policies to remain in power (the last is how leftist parties in Europe have abused open-borders policies for decades).

However, given the laconic nature of Q’s comms and the distraction presented by other burning issues, we’ve largely forgotten about the need to expand our thinking on the phenomenon of the migration deep state: what it is, who it involves, how it operates, how it justifies and defends itself, and so on. And I’m not just saying this needs to be discussed because I wrote a book about it. Or because roughly one million migrants passed by train (about two miles from my house here in tiny Macedonia- a country with a population of two million). These mostly economic migrants were passing through on the ‘Balkan Route’ from Turkey and Greece onwards to Serbia, Hungary, Austria and Germany, following Angela Merkel’s unilateral suspension of EU rules in fall 2015, during the great ‘European Migration Crisis.’

To put my experience in ratio perspective: this would be like if Justin Trudeau demanded the US government send an unlimited supply of migrants and 170 million migrants crossed the US from Mexico to Canada.

Which is exactly the sort of outcome that the ‘open borders’ crowd and the deep state that controls them wants- the sort of thing a Hillary Clinton administration would have done in a second, if given the chance.

The Sixteen-Year-Plan: A Fake Crisis, Obama’s UN Cash-In and What Should Have Happened

The migration deep state’s super-structure organizes EU programs, UN initiatives and the well-funded ‘civil society’ movement in migration affairs. The media and pundits do their part by launching a rapid-fire drama of humanitarian tragedies, protests, violence, political rhetoric and grandiose plans for saving the world.

In reality, the Cabal’s globalist migration policies are made in air-conditioned offices, far from the front lines and front pages, protected from public scrutiny by bureaucrats specialized in delivering death by a thousand footnotes to the citizens of sovereign states, in the forms of treaties and agreements and loaded annexes.

Indeed, despite the tangible improvements that the US (and some other governments) are trying to make to safeguard their borders and citizens, the migration deep state has not been affected – rather, its funding and programs have expanded, and at a faster rate than planned, as Trump’s abrupt interference with the Sixteen-Year Plan forced them to lay down their cards earlier than planned. This cannot be overemphasized. The kind of insanity demonstrated by the Democratic Party over the past couple years was not expected to be seen for some years. Had things gone according to the program, there would have been no need to rush immediately to the end game. They would have had eight comfortable years of HRC to implement the plan and enjoy watching the country’s disintegration. As Q has written, if America falls, the world falls. This is why patriots need to keep informed and keep sharing their research.

So let’s rewind to September 2015, keeping in mind this tacit contextual element: the inevitability factor. For in just over one year, Hillary Rodham Clinton would be elected president of the United States, taking the baton from Barack Obama, the man who had delayed her rightful ascension. By 2024, when the destruction of America as we knew it would have been complete, a Bush or a Clinton would have occupied (at least) one of the nation’s highest positions for 44 of the previous 48 years. Because that’s… totally normal.

That fall, Merkel’s open invite to migrants from the Middle East, Asia and Africa had caused serious problems for European society- and for the migrants themselves. After all, she hadn’t exactly provided charter flights. Instead they were left to their own devices, making dangerous journeys across land and sea, as we have seen with migrants traveling from Central America to the US border. Both here and there, the great humanitarians of the political and public elite force travel models that increase the likelihood of injury and death because such results are absolutely fantastic for fundraising and bureaucratic expansion. It is that simple, and that evil.

In Europe, billions of euros were made by everyone from human traffickers and mafia groups to international organizations and corporations contracted to provide logistical services for governments dealing with the ‘refugee burden.’ A moralistic MSM had a field day, contrasting the newfound piety of European leaders supporting the grand experiment with the obviously racist critics of the policy. In a particularly nauseating and hypocritical piece, Cabal mouthpiece Time lauded Angela Merkel as the ‘Chancellor of the Free World’ for 2015.

The 24/7 media coverage of what was largely a created crisis granted the opportunity for EU policy continuation (to be discussed further below) and international globalist migration policy, driven by the Obama Administration, Big Tech, the Vatican and migration deep state NGOs funded by Cabal foundations and financiers like George Soros.

The big cash-in was scheduled for September 2016 at the UN. To get there, the EU had to put the crisis on pause, which they did in a spring agreement with the Turkish government (this was done through the stealth diplomacy of a Soros-linked NGO, as I cover in the book). With populist grumblings rising, anarchist violence on the Italian, French and Greek borders, the shock of Brexit, and politically problematic criminality from new migrants throughout Europe causing local tensions, the bloc needed to keep the appearance of order for long enough to get to the next step in the Sixteen-Year Plan.

And this they did. Remember that as of September 20, 2016 and the UN’s specially-organized ‘Leaders Summit on Refugees,’ there was no reason for concern. HRC would become president, the US would continue Obama’s migrant policy, and the party would continue. The New York gathering of some 52 countries showed the migration deep state on full display:

The event kicked off with the typically nauseating rhetoric of President Obama, who shamelessly lamented the fate of migrants from countries he’d either personally invaded (Libya), terrorized with jihadist militias (Syria, Iraq) or droned to death (Afghanistan). Hussein’s hyperbole was geared towards supporting the Soros-Merkel argument that all countries must import more migrants, while sharing news about several multi-billion-dollar projects recently arranged between the US, UN, migrant NGOs, corporations and so on. Obama added that “starting next week, the United States will welcome and resettle 110,000 refugees from around the world — which is a nearly 60 percent increase over 2015.”

Remember, this was halfway through the Sixteen-Year Plan.

The 2016 UN event included these additional highlights that show the manufactured crisis of 2015 led to the deep-state payout of 2016:

‘George Soros is investing $500 million to help refugees,’ reports CNN, adding:

“The investments will be owned by Soros’ nonprofit organizations. ‘These investments are intended to be successful … but our primary focus is to create products and services that truly benefit migrants and host communities,’ he said.

In an opinion article in the Wall Street Journal, Soros wrote that his main concern is to help migrants and refugees arriving in Europe, but that he will be looking for good investment ideas to benefit migrants everywhere.”

Of course he would.

But not alone.

Because…

Big Tech/Start-up World/Finance announced plans to ‘invest’ $650 million, answering Obama’s “plea” for migrant support (Microsoft, Facebook, IBM, TripAdvisor, Goldman Sachs, McKinsey, Mastercard, HP, Google, Accenture, Western Union, LinkedIn, Airbnb, Autodesk, Coursera, SAP, Twilio, Uber, Udemy and Zynga), in line with a pre-cooked White House plan (full list of the 51 companies here).

No wonder that the UN High Commission on Human Rights gushed that the summit was a ‘game changer’ for migration matters.

Oh, and the autists among you will love these details from the above CNET article:

“Google said it will also contribute a $1 million grant to the Clooney Foundation for Justice, established by actor George Clooney and his wife, Amal, to help educate Syrian refugee children in Lebanon. Google has already donated $16.5 million to other humanitarian efforts.

Microsoft plans to team with local providers to deliver wireless broadband to refugees and international aid organizations in Malawi, and it’s teaming with HP to provide tech training in refugee camps in Lebanon and Jordan. That training will lead to certifications that qualify them for worker visa programs instead of requiring that they go through the more laborious government refugee process.

(Emphasis mine)

So yeah, nothing to see here.

Now that you’ve seen how the feeding frenzy looked like, let’s get down to the structure and personalities at the heart of the migration deep state.

But First… Does an Unexpected Change in Terminology indicate the ‘Trump Effect’ at Work on the IOM?

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) is the UN’s prime agency on the issue, and thus is located at the very heart of the migration deep state since its establishment in 1951. According to the IOM website, it is “the leading inter-governmental organization in the field of migration and works closely with governmental, intergovernmental and non-governmental partners.”

And it looks like something very interesting has recently happened there.

I was just pulling up the site to show you its insanely broad definition of “who is a migrant”only to find that they have changed it withing the past six months…

Thank God for screenshots.

I’ve asked their spokesmen in the past to account for the definition, simply because it was such an affront to common sense and because of its implications for the ‘global governance’ ambitions of the Cabal. Read it below, and you will quickly see why. I got some milquetoast answer at one point, but nothing that explained who came up with the definition, why, or what the intentions behind it were on a legalistic basis.

Had I not taken the below screenshot last year, the discrepancy between what the IOM previously stated in its definition of migrants and what it offers now would be lost. Fortunately, you can see the screenshot (December 2018) of the old, and a new one now (July 2019).

Not only has the definition been rewritten to make it somewhat less Orwellian, but it also comes with caveats (see my highlights around their text) that restate that the definition does not reflect international law, but only IOM’s internal use – something conspicuously absent from previous versions.

I’m calling this the Trump Effect. I’m guessing that someone from the Administration reminded the IOM of where much of their funding come from, and that pretensions to global population dominance were not cool. Would this definition have been changed had Hillary won and the Sixteen-Year-Plan marched merrily onward? Highly doubtful. Sometimes, this kind of tiny detail reveals much bigger things.

Whatever the case, it’s highly revealing – and frankly, a little encouraging – to see a Cabal main front agency forced to dial it down, even if just in terms of rhetoric. Because these definitions still matter- they are often the unstated ‘norms’ which underpin international treaties about which the average citizen is never informed.

So, here is the old definition…

And here is the new.

Notice the differences?

 

With that noted, let’s move on to the UN’s role at the center of the migration deep state.

The Migration Deep State Alliance System and Structure, Part 1: the UN Agencies and Programs

In order to destroy sovereign states, international and transnational organizations with zero public accountability, unelected officials, and budgets that always tend to increase will always remain the most lethal weapon. The major example here is the UN, with the EU having base similarities which will be discussed further on. But the United Nations, based in New York, and several of its migration and development agencies (based there and around the world) provides the key, indestructible, and thoroughly non-accountable core of the migration deep state.

One of the key such agencies is the above-mentioned IOM. Its growth exemplifies the inherent tendency of such international agencies towards bureaucratic expansion and acquisition of territory, funds and duties. When there are no checks and balances to restrict administrative sprawl (as sovereign states provide), such organizations naturally tend to expand. The IOM started out in 1951 in the post-WWII environment, with a strict remit of helping Europeans displaced by the war; indeed, it was literally called the Provisional Intergovernmental Committee for the Movement of Migrants from Europe (PICMME).

As it turned out, the organization wasn’t that ‘provisional’ after all, even though post-war Europe was back on its feet. As the UN consolidated its powers and conditions for global governance projects improved, the agency expanded globally, acquiring its present name only in 1989. As the official website’s history recounts, it has taken on quite a presence:

“From its roots as an operational logistics agency, it has broadened its scope to become the leading international agency working with governments and civil society to advance the understanding of migration issues, encourage social and economic development through migration, and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. The broader scope of activities has been matched by rapid expansion from a relatively small agency into one with an annual operating budget of an estimated $1.5 billion and more than 10,000 staff working in over 150 countries worldwide. IOM currently has 173 Member States and a further 8 states holding Observer status.”

(Emphasis mine)

The second major UN organization of note is the UNHCR (UN High Commission for Refugees or, as we used to call it for fun, ‘Usually No Help Concerning Refugees’). Its mandate involves providing “vital assistance to refugees, asylum-seeker’s, internally displaced and stateless people, many of whom have nobody left to turn to.”

This UN body was established a year before the IOM in 1950; like the latter, it was meant to help specifically European WWII refugees rebuild their lives. The UNHCR’s official history even admits, “we had three years to complete our work and then disband.”

Disband? Well that would hardly be in the spirit of global governance…

And so the UNHCR expanded, first getting Merkel-style positive PR at the crucial moment (the entire organization won the 1954 Nobel Peace Prize) and then getting its own ‘migrant crisis’ via the Hungarian Revolution two years later. That secured its mandate and from then on it was smooth sailing to Africa and other points abroad. Today, it has become a global behemoth with over 16,800 personnel in 134 countries, and a budget of $6.54 billion, as of 2016. (They have the audacity to ask for your personal donations on their website as well).

So, Anons… how about a real-life example of how the UNHCR operates clandestinely in plain sight?

In fall 2015, a steady flow of Middle Eastern migrants that had entered Greece by sea from Turkey were massing on Macedonia’s southern border. The UNHCR had dispatched an ‘expert’ to liaise with the UN’s local staff and partners, as well as the government, to help decide what to do about it. Macedonia and Greece were not keen to cooperate (long story), presenting an ideal justification for globalist intervention. As usual, the UNHCR thought that sending some guy who knew nothing about the local culture, society, politics etc. on a four-month contract to save the situation. This operational style is built into the structure to guarantee anonymity, non-accountability and distancing/deniability when the UN eventually makes things worse instead of better.

A lot of people couldn’t believe it when I reported what he told me a few months later: that the UN recommended putting 30,000 Muslim migrants in camps inside this tiny, ethnically-mixed country then in Clown-controlled political turmoil. How could they think this would be a good idea?

Fortunately, the authorities of that time did not fall for it, and the situation was handled by (as I said) sending Merkel’s invited guests through as quickly as possible via train, making no stops. Three years later, I obtained leaked documents from the 2015 meetings of the UNHCR and the local government and NGOs – I highly recommend you take a look… because these docs show how the UN operates, and how this is very appealing to globalist corporations and anyone, really, aligned with corrupt practices.

Indeed, everything from ordering 33,000 mattresses and randomly handing out cash (cash!) to all migrants crossing the border, to putting others up with ‘host families’ shows how the UN instinctively responds to such crises – and how the migration deep state works in practical terms on the ground. No wonder that the biggest companies in the world rushed like pigs to the trough to answer Obama’s “plea for help” at the September 2016 UN conference on migrants.

A third body under the UN umbrella with relation to migration deep state issues is the UN Development Programme (UNDP), which is a core pillar of the larger humanitarian-development complex. Working in almost 200 countries, the UNDP is not only well-funded, but is the key driver in the UN’s 2030 development platform that has been so decried by sovereignty-minded persons the world over. As the official website states:

This is a critical time for the world. At UNDP, we see this period as a huge opportunity to advance the global sustainable development agenda. In September 2015, world leaders adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development to end poverty, protect the planet and ensure that all people enjoy peace and prosperity. UNDP is working to strengthen new frameworks for development, disaster risk reduction and climate change. We support countries’ efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, or Global Goals, which will guide global development priorities through 2030.

The UNDP’s laudable and completely unattainable goals (‘zero poverty’ in the next 11 years? Seriously?) provide an ideal opportunity for mass redistribution of wealth from nations and institutions throughout the system, amounting to enormous and untraceable slush funds with inevitable political outcomes. It is worth noting that these Sustainable Development Goals were approved by the UN at the end of 2015 (during the European migration crisis) and codified in 2016 – another globalist goal reached at the midway point of the Sixteen-Year Plan.

As the UNDP is active in all sorts of humanitarian disasters, I’m surprised that the autists haven’t looked into the relationships between institutions and political personalities with such UN agencies at key points of modern history. For example, consider the heavy emphasis Q has repeatedly given to HRC, Haiti and New Zealand. One might find it interesting to note that in 2010, when the Bush-Clinton Haiti fundraiser was going on, the lead UNDP official interacting with Hillary Clinton’s State Department was one Helen Clark, a former New Zealand prime minister. They cooperated closely on the Haiti mission and others, as noted in this meeting recap from June 2010). Further, as Wikipedia noted, Clark “was also the Chair of the United Nations Development Group, a committee consisting of the heads of all UN funds, programmes and departments working on development issues.”

Nevertheless on May 24, 2016, WaPo-owned Cabal magazine Foreign Policy ran quite the hit piece on the doughty bureaucrat, claiming that UNDP insiders “accuse Clark of ruthlessly ending the careers of underlings in her quest to advance her candidacy and of undercutting the U.N.’s promotion of human rights.” By ‘candidacy,’ FP meant the contest for who would replace Ban Ki-Moon as UN Secretary General that fall – right after the US election that Hillary Clinton would certainly win. It’s rare that deep state actors turn on each other like this, and one cannot be sure whether the Clinton camp perceived Clark as a potential liability or threat (due to Haiti, etc). or whether internal rival competitors were behind the hit piece.

In any case, the UN top spot was won by UNHCR chief (2005-2015) and former Portuguese prime minister António Manuel de Oliveira Guterres, who also once headed the Socialist Internationale. In June 2018, Guterres approved António Vitorino (a former European commissioner and defense minister under his Portuguese cabinet) as the next IOM Director General. At the same time, Clark was relegated to opining that HRC had lost the presidency due to sexism back in NZ (infamous among anons at the time due to the country’s role in 5Eyes/SpyGate and Hillary’s visit to meet former Tony Blair protégé, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardem. But why would Hillary have wanted to see Clark? What are the chances that she knows where the Haiti relief money went? We recall Trump’s EO of 12/2017 that Q has highlighted often.

Probably nothing to see here!

The Migration Deep State Alliance System and Structure, Part 2: Think-tanks, Open-Borders Policies and the Foundations that Support them- Case Study MPI

The first category of entities shaping open-borders policy today comprises think-tanks with a direct migration mandate and universities (the big one being Columbia). There are just too many to discuss, so for one case study, let’s cover the most influential of these at present: the US-based Migration Policy Institute (MPI). Although associated with (and indeed funded by (along with many others) George Soros, MPI is actually an extension of the Carnegie Endowment (i.e., a central pillar of the Cabal): it came into being in 2001, when the Carnegie Endowment’s International Migration Policy Program (IMPP) was renamed and became an ‘independent’ body. Kathleen Newland, who had been a Carnegie senior associate and longtime migration expert, founded MPI together with Demetrios Papademetriou, a former director for immigration policy and research in the Clinton Administration Department of Labor.

As with the UN agencies, MPI is directly at the heart of the migration deep state, with direct ties to the Democratic Party and its open-borders insanity. Since (even before) its founding, the MPI has had a dedicated focus on Mexico (official page here). The general policy seems to be the gradual erosion of the US-Mexico border, as the Sixteen-Year Plan was meant to accomplish. And this has been a very, very long time in the planning; take for example Papademetriou’s 2002 MPI policy paper, entitled ‘A Grand Bargain: Balancing the National Security, Economic, and Immigration Interests of the U.S. and Mexico.’ It calls for more rights for illegal (specifically Mexican) immigrants, and (as its epilogue reveals) is based on extremely calculated political strategy regarding what the president, Congress and local political actors could be expected to win or lose from implementing the suggested migration ‘reforms’ after approaching mid-term elections.

Aside from lobbying, the MPI’s analytical output benefits from lavish funding and cooperation with NGOs, institutions, ground researchers and so on, which has made them an invaluable source of information for both media and government. This knowledge can be very useful. It might interest anons to know that, way back in 2006, the MPI released a detailed report on MS-13, its development from Los Angeles, spread to Central America and related issues. This indicated a deep knowledge of the gang since the 1990s. Interestingly enough, it is stated that the FBI had recently established a special unit for MS-13…

MPI’s open-borders lobbying carries over to its Brussels-based spinoff, MPI Europe, which was founded in 2011 and then played a key role in influencing EU policy during the European migrant crisis. It has systematically assessed the political orientations of hundreds of European politicians to see which ones it can count on for its open-borders positions. MPI keeps on trying to do the same in the Trump Administration- which, while definitely not in favor of the migration deep state agenda, has been unable to stop UN-directed initiatives that have been long in progress.

The most important such event was the UN’s December 2018 Marrakesh Summit, at which countries ratified the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration. This was a direct continuation of the ‘New York Declaration’ masterminded by Obama, Merkel, Soros and the UN in September 2016. According to the IOM, “the global compact for migration is the first, intergovernmentally negotiated agreement, prepared under the auspices of the United Nations, to cover all dimensions of international migration in a holistic and comprehensive manner.” Curiously enough, as of 2019 the aid agency has the world’s number of migrants as “over 258 million,” whereas just under three years before, Obama had given the somewhat more modest number of 68 million in his fulsome speech at the UN. Clearly, this is a growth industry…

Again, I draw your attention to the importance of definitions (as in the above screen shots), because definitions are what creates statistics… and thereafter policy, followed by massive taxpayer wealth redistribution. According to the IOM, if you take a student year abroad, you are a migrant. And so on.

Although the US under the Trump Administration (along with Hungary, the Czech Republic, Poland and Israel) voted against the Global Compact, even the most optimistic Anons have to admit just how difficult undoing the damage done by globalists in the migration deep state will be. I reckon 99 percent of the American public has probably never heard of any of these conventions, summits and agencies.

This ignorance makes it incredibly easy for the globalist elite to systematically carry out their plans.

The MPI and (notably) Angela Merkel’s German Development Cooperation Agency are hard at work on pushing the controversial UN policy, to reverse US policy and bring those pesky Central European countries into line. MPI and the German agency are now promoting the Global Compact in lobbying and a policy paper that “has tracked the compact’s negotiation and begun to look ahead to its implementation.”

That said, it probably wouldn’t come as a surprise that MPI policy papers have recently trashed Trump’s plan to deal with migration, while also showing quite a lot of interest in the 2020 census and the citizenship question.

Could it be that the MPI is actually a front group for the Cabal’s slush funds and Democratic Party’s election hopes?

Let’s see where their funding comes from. According to the MPI website:

“MPI is funded primarily through research grants from foundations. We also receive funding from organizations, U.S. and international government agencies, corporations, and individuals. Their investment allows MPI to provide thoughtful, unbiased research and analysis of migration and refugee policies in the United States and internationally. MPI is able to disseminate policy-relevant material and engage a broader audience through their generous support.”

(Emphasis mine)

So, who are these funders of MPI’s ‘unbiased’ open-borders lobbying and research?

According to the official website some of the ‘major’ donors ‘include’ the following:

  • Annie E. Casey Foundation
  • Inter-American Development Bank
  • Atlantic Philanthropies
  • International Organization for Migration
  • Barrow Cadbury Trust
  • International Rescue Committee
  • Bertelsmann Stiftung
  • JM Kaplan Fund
  • Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP
  • Kendeda Fund
  • Booz Allen Hamilton
  • King Baudouin Foundation
  • Boston Foundation
  • John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
  • Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, U.S. Department of State
  • Luso-American Foundation (FLAD)
  • Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • California Community Foundation
  • Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
  • Carnegie Corporation of New York
  • Manhattan Institute
  • Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
  • Marin Community Foundation
  • Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc.
  • m-Via Center for Applied Linguistics
  • Suzette Brooks Masters and Seth Masters Center for Global Development
  • Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
  • Centre on Migration, Policy and Society (COMPAS), Oxford University
  • Napa Valley Community Foundation
  • The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations
  • National Conference of State Legislatures
  • Community Foundation of Greater Atlanta
  • New Global Initiatives, Inc.
  • Danish Institute for Human Rights
  • Northwest Area Foundation
  • Danish Refugee Council
  • Stavros S. Niarchos Foundation
  • Delegation of the European Union to the United States
  • National Center for Border Security and Immigration (NCBSI), University of Arizona
  • European Commission — Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, and Directorate General for Home Affairs
  • Office of Refugee Resettlement, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Ford Foundation
  • Open Society Foundations
  • Foundation for Child Development
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
  • Foundation for Population, Migration and Environment (BMU), Switzerland
  • Public Interest Projects, Inc.
  • The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Public Welfare Foundation
  • German Marshall Fund of the United States
  • The Rockefeller Foundation
  • Global Commission on International Migration
  • Russell Sage Foundation
  • Government of Canada, Citizenship and Immigration, Canada
  • SEIU – Service Employees International Union
  • Government of Finland, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  • Smith Richardson Foundation
  • Government of Germany, Bundesministerium des Innern (BM)
  • Southeast Asia Resource Action Center
  • Government of Greece, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  • Tinker Foundation, Inc.
  • Government of Italy, Ministry of Labor and Social Policy
  • Unbound Philanthropy
  • Government of Mexico, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Secretariat of the Interior
  • UNITE HERE
  • Government of Moldova
  • UN High Commissioner for Refugees
  • Government of the Netherlands
  • UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
  • Government of Norway, Ministry of Justice and Ministry of Children, Equality and Social Inclusion
  • Urban Institute
  • Government of Spain, Ministry of Labor and Immigration
  • U.S. Census Bureau
  • Government of Sweden, Ministry of Justice and Ministry of Employment
  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce
  • Government of Taiwan, National Immigration Agency
  • U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops Migration and Refugee Services
  • Government of the United Kingdom, Home Office and Department of International Development
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  • Grantmakers Concerned with Immigrants and Refugees
  • Walmart
  • Evelyn and Walter Haas, Jr. Fund
  • Western Union Foundation
  • Hamburg Institute for International Economics (Winthrop Rockefeller Foundation)
  • Heising-Simons Foundation
  • W.K. Kellogg Foundation
  • Charles Evan Hughes Memorial Foundation
  • World Bank
  • Illinois Coalition for Immigrants and Refugee Rights
  • World Health Organization
  • Zellerbach Family Foundation.

Happy digging, Anons!

And remember: MPI is just one of the migration deep state’s funded NGOs for lobbying on open-borders, anti-sovereignty migration policy. There are many, many more. All of these are important- the emphasis on some of the above is just me pointing out some that are particularly interesting or that have come up in separate contexts in Q research.

The Migration Deep State Alliance System and Structure, Part 3: the European Union and its Southern Expansionism

Like the UN, the EU arose from the ashes of WWII but (at the beginning at least) had much more humble ambitions. Its first incarnation was as a simple ‘Coal and Steel Community,’ between a handful of advanced Western states. The argument went that if France and Germany were obliged to cooperate on their industrial output, neither would have a monopoly on military materiel that could result in a third world war.

Of course, the ambitions of the nascent Euro-elite and their continuity of pre-war Marxist and Federalist ideologies were much greater than that (I have put together an intriguing collection of characters and events running from Count Coudenhove-Kallergi to today’s migration crisis in a short e-book, Behind the European Project: Shadow Aristocracy, Secret Networks, Religious Orders and an Unholy Union, for anyone interested in some of the back-history).

For many years, the European project was simply an economic community (albeit with increasingly centralized legislation for those who would be members eventually). But it was not until the Maastricht Treaty of 1992 that the European Union officially came into being. While it had plenty to do in cementing its own internal relations (not to mention dealing with the end of the Soviet Union and war in Yugoslavia), the bloc showed its expansionist hand by almost immediately moving forward with the ‘Barcelona Process,’ led by Spanish Foreign Minister (and future NATO chief) Javier Solana (another arch-globalist).

Known also as the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (Euromed), it began with the Barcelona Euro-Mediterranean Conference of 1995. At that event, European and some African states agreed “to establish a comprehensive partnership among the participants – the Euro-Mediterranean partnership – through strengthened political dialogue on a regular basis, the development of economic and financial cooperation and greater emphasis on the social, cultural and human dimension, these being the three aspects of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership.” By 2008, it had become known as the Union for the Mediterranean – a 43-country grouping that became a mechanism for carrying out integration treaties with Europe’s trans-Mediterranean African neighbors.

This empire fantasy was not just a Continental European thing. British deep-staters like Foreign Secretary David Milliband have been key Anglo-influencers. He in fact kicked off his new job in 2007 by proclaiming a vision for a “version of the European Free Trade Association that could gradually bring the countries of the Maghreb, the Middle East and Eastern Europe in line with the single market, not as an alternative to membership, but potentially as a step towards it.”

These policies are richly rewarded by the migration deep state. Since 2013, David Miliband has been President and CEO of the International Rescue Committee, one of the biggest migration NGOs. (This Labour Party member has been lauded by Bill Clinton and, surprisingly enough, recently attacked POTUS’ migration policy in leftist rag The Guardian).

A major beneficiary (on an operational and financial basis) of these initiatives has been the southern Mediterranean EU bloc: Spain, Italy, Greece, Portugal and (since 2004) Malta and Cyprus. The role of the Greek and Italian leftist elite, particularly during the migrant crisis was huge; the leaders and shadow actors between such countries, and the EU and UN agencies have had a major impact on shaping EU and UN strategies towards using migration, to expand supranational power and influence across what was once dubbed a ‘Roman lake.’

Indeed, the degree of the Europe Union’s aspirations to spread its influence, operations, and funds southward should not be overlooked in the context of globalist, open-borders tendencies in the migration war. Take, for a more recent example, the EU’s ‘Khartoum Process,’ which began with an event held in Rome in mid-November 2014, under the Italian EU presidency (the EU’s workings include a rotating, symbolic ‘presidency’ for different member countries, while the real power lies in Brussels, Strasbourg and Frankfurt).

The official website described it thus:

The Khartoum Process is a platform for political cooperation amongst the countries along the migration route between the Horn of Africa and Europe.

Also known as the EU-Horn of Africa Migration Route Initiative, the inter-continental consultation framework aims at:

  • Establishing a continuous dialogue for enhanced cooperation on migration and mobility.
  • Identifying and implementing concrete projects to address trafficking in human beings and the smuggling of migrants.
  • Giving a new impetus to the regional collaboration between countries of origin, transit and destination regarding the migration route between the Horn of Africa and Europe.

This was no isolated event, and has been expanded as European elites continue to expand their southward reach. The Khartoum Process was considered a ‘sister process’ of the similar Rabat Process of 2005. These initiatives are included under the EU’s overarching Global Approach on Migration and Mobility (GAMM), in place since 2005. By 2013, it had disbursed 1bn euros in funding, two years after the Obama Administration had destroyed Libya through NATO (we all know who benefited from that adventure) and eliminated Gaddafi, who had long kept a gentleman’s agreement with Italian conservative governments to keep migrants from crossing by sea into Italy. But the stars aligned for the globalists with the arrival of a leftist Pope Francis (who made his first trip after becoming pontiff to the migrant-swamped Italian island of Lampedusa), and the leftist government of Matteo Renzi (which was only unseated relatively recently by a populist revolt).

So, what a surprise that when a sudden and completely unexpected migration crisis came along in 2015, a new ‘emergency’ summit was held in Malta in November (not long after the main spike in migrants caused by Merkel’s invite, and at the same time as the Bataclan terrorist attack in Paris). It resulted in the Joint Valletta Action Plan (JVAP) and explicitly linked with Rabat and Khartoum (read the proceedings here); as an extension of an orderly progress, though that’s not how the media depicted it. They preferred the cartoon version whereby heroic and generous Europeans were responding to an unexpected humanitarian disaster that somehow no one had foreseen.

Brussels was then able to pull together by the very next year the EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa (i.e., slush fund to launder among local and Euro-elite). According to the EU, the Trust Fund is meant to support “the most fragile and affected African countries.”

These have been efficiently divided into three categories, and indicate an expansionist ambition. The first group (Sahel region and Lake Chad) specifies Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, the Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria and Senegal. The second group (the Horn of Africa) includes the countries of Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania and Uganda. Finally, the ‘North of Africa’ includes Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia.

Further, the EU notes, other African neighbors of these countries “may benefit, on a case by case basis, from Trust Fund projects with a regional dimension in order to address regional migration flows and related cross-border challenges.”

So, all that being said, would it surprise you to learn that the European super-state is presently running a big-data analysis center in the capital of Sudan? So it appears, from the official website and from the May 2018 Khartoum Process meeting in Kenya.

At the ‘Thematic Meeting on Data Collection and Management’ held that day in Nairobi, the participating states discussed “data management, analysis, and dissemination.” Discussion followed “regarding the data collection and management practices in the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) region as well as in the individual countries, such as Kenya, Italy, and Malta.”

The event went on to plan for data collection management policy “for the purposes of optimisation of migration management… and setting priority actions that could help reduce data gaps, on the one hand, and promote a better use of existing data sources, on the other hand.” This is all apparently being run through something called the Regional Operational Centre Khartoum (ROCK), which has a ‘Knowledge Centre on Migration and Demography (KCMD),’ both providing the bean-counters in Brussels with “accurate and relevant knowledge and analysis” regarding migration data.

But, as usual with these kinds of European operations, there’s a twist: some digging revealed that the actual management over at the ROCK is executed by CiviPol, an unusual public-private group of French spooks. As one employment website notes:

“Civipol is the consulting and service company of the French Ministry of the Interior. As a specialist in project engineering, in France and abroad, it provides customized advice, technical assistance and owner support services, as well as auditing and training expertise in the areas of homeland security and governance. Civipol works on behalf of French government departments, foreign states, corporations and multilateral donors, notably the European Union”

Well that is one wide remit, isn’t it?

When you research deeply into how migration deep state structures actually operate, you find that at the ground level, the actual face of the institutions – whether EU, UN, US or other – is actually that of private or (as in the ROCK case) semi-private contractors. This corporate aspect adds another level of depth to the entire deep state, and helps explain investments, donations, Clown operations, political symmetries and more.

But these details never make the news. Both the existence of trans-national agreements and their implementation are technical, deliberately obscure, and well-hidden on the backpages of bureaucracy. It is up to us to research and dig if we want to expose the criminality, corruption and overall malevolence of those who desire a centrally-planned, no-borders socialist paradise (for themselves, at least).


Chris Deliso is an American journalist and security analyst researching from Europe for the past 17 years, and holds an MPhil in Byzantine History from Oxford University. He is the author of Migration, Terrorism, and the Future of a Divided Europe: A Continent Transformed (Praeger Security International, 2017). His official website is Chrisdeliso.com.

10 thoughts on “Guest Post: Inside the Migration Deep State – by Chris Deliso #QAnon #GreatAwakening #NEONREVOLT”

  1. More to the point and in line with Mr Deliso’s paper the way to make sure things go as planned in the great circus of the humanitarian development complex, combines a recipe of “spoiling attacks” and “creative destruction” by the great military industrial complex.

    HRC famous take on Gaddafi “we came, we saw and he died” is at the center of the Middle East Globalist agenda for managing refugees. This in turn driven by the Zionist state strategy for achieving a greater Israel. Now and Mr Deliso sure is aware of this terminology, in this context, the refugees of the humanitarian development complex have become profitable instruments of mass destruction/migration. For the academic/current affairs definition of refugees as IMD/M there is a whole literature there. Most of it arcane and obscure to the average American, (to paraphrase Mr Deliso) but just in case two references, both made in USA 🙂

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/09/11/refugee-flows-a-grand-strategic-weapon-of-mass-destruction/

    https://www.find-more-books.com/book/isbn/9780801448713.html

    Refugees are just cheaper to manufacture than atomic bombs, carry less liabilities than Hiroshima, and you can raise more money before…. by selling weapons, during….. appealing for and to humanitarian needs and instincts and after…… through walls and law and order not just to build walls but also to palliate for the fear and instability created 🙂

    The need to destabilize Europe through “terror attacks” and an “Islamic wave of refugees” has been paramount to allow the state of Israel to expand their “victim” narrative and lies onto the gullible citizens living in Europe. Europeans are now enlisted……. First the USA now Europe has been high jacked to fight Israel conquest wars to establish a greater Israel. Mr Deliso should go further in defining “quid prodest” who benefits in the globalist agenda and clearly point the finger at Israel and not only in the Middle East. This globalist agenda has some parents i.e. the NeoCons but the mother or better the despicable “mother in law” is the state of Israel. Always there whispering in the ears of those poor parents.

    Pedophilia, as in blackmail, Central Banks as in public debt and Israel as in “False Flags Attacks” are part of one and the same mechanism of war and violence where more poor people are being taken hostage and displaced by the same war and humanitarian machine. One and the same, eaten alive, literally. America needs to wake up to the truth of 9/11. Then take that truth back to Jerusalem and sort out things there. Jerusalem remains the center of the world, but what happens in the USA can save the world. WWG1WGA. Let us go to Jerusalem! And sorten things out there.

  2. Looks like an abundance of great research info Deliso! But, I don’t have the time these days to read and properly digest what seems like a few chapters of a big book. Would you consider summarizing your points? Or can it be summarized by your statement “The global elites running this industry do not want to solve problems: they want to manage problems?” They create problems in order to make money off of managing them? Upheaval = $$?

  3. I do not agree with the statements made against Israel in the reply section. I do thank the author and researcher for neon revolt.com Very eye opening. So much so that the problem seems overwhelming.
    What can we do to correct a problem that is so huge, and so longstanding, and so imbedded?
    I was shocked to see U.S.A Homeland Security included — I do not believe that most of the noble dedicated young men and women risking their lives to protect our nation’s borders, coast lines, international airports and sea ports realize that that there could be any part of Homeland Security that is not fully supporting the protection of the Constitutional Republic of United States of America.
    How can this serious problem be corrected? What can the average U.S. Citizen do to contribute to the correction of this problem? How can we remove members of CAIR from the department of Homeland Security? Read their articles of incorporation — their statement of purpose. You can find it online.

  4. All of these deranged white people will be disappointed when they finally learn that these people are not their friends after all. Remember: not all former muslims are actually former.

  5. My city has become Johannesburg light in the past year. It’s amazing how many immigrants have invaded the region. Interesting tidbit : of the 45,000 illegals who have entered Canada in the past year only 900 have been kicked out. While our infrastructure disappears into ever-growing potholes billions are spent on these unwelcome visitors. Legal immigrants have made Canada the interesting place it used to be until (paid) illegals have made it a growing cesspool of liberal madness.

    In good mythical Canadian fashion I apologize for boring you about Canada.

  6. According to the official website some of the ‘major’ donors ‘include’ the following:
    – Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc.

    Isn’t one of the not-so-secret secret goals of the globalist carnival to eradicate Christianity? Only a Christian is benevolent (naive) enough to participate in her own demise.

  7. Those that comment that they don’t have time to read such a lengthy article are the enablers of the deep state. The DS counts on being able to hide their actions because the average citizen will not read an in-depth report that researches their origin and their plan for their idea of our future.

Leave a Reply to Joanna Evensen Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: