TROLLING IS FUN! (Should I Write for #SNL? Naaaaahhhhh!) #NewQ #QAnon #GreatAwakening

TROLLING IS FUN! (Should I Write for #SNL? Naaaaahhhhh!) #NewQ #QAnon #GreatAwakening

First thing’s first – Happy Father’s Day to all the dads out there! (I started writing this on Father’s day, okay? The Qdrops didn’t stop!) Your job is more important than you could possibly know! Your families, and as a result the nation, prospers because of your strength and dedication!

(And no, single moms, you don’t get to steal their thunder. You already had your day. KEK).

Second thing: MAJOR CORRECTION, in case you missed the update to the last article.

I was late to the Qdrops, so I didn’t see today’s confirmation of Sohale Siddiqi’s identity until after I had published. How could I have missed it! I read through all the drops as they were happening, this morning!

Except, I use QAnon.pub to catch the drops before heading to the boards.

And QAnon.pub just happened to miss this oooooone post this ooooooone time. So it was not with the others when I read through them this morning, and didn’t appear until I did a page refresh – even as new drops were still arriving on the page in realtime:

I am, however, still really frustrated with this revelation, because the Siddiqi lead seemingly violated two rules Q gave us:

No facial hair, and search Hussein Admin.

Siddiqi never worked for the Obama Administration, AFAIK, and every single friggin’ of the guy of him is with that beard of his.

So yes, in my mind, that disqualified him from the mystery man mustache running, because it looked like two flagrant rule violations of what Q said. In the meantime, I doggedly pursued the Vali Nasr lead, much to the chagrin of many anons. but it’s worth noting that I still uncovered a lot of information that was very incriminating, when looked at through the lens of understanding the Government was being infiltrated and subverted by the Muslim Brotherhood.

So let’s review that briefly:

  • Nasr is from Iran.
  • He’s the architect of the Iran deal.
  • He worked for Obama’s State Department’s Foreign Affairs Policy Board.
  • Worked for the Council on Foreign Relations.
  • He traveled outside the US with his Iranian passport.
  • He wrote books advocating intervention is Syria.

Come ON! That guys just HAS to be Muslim Brotherhood! No way he’s not in on all of it! Too many “coincidences.” And as we all know, #NoCoincidences.

Meanwhile, Siddiqi… he’s a recovering drug addict and worked at a community theater in Seattle with all the other bugchasers, as far as I can tell.

So I hope my readers see why I went down the wrong rabbit-hole.

But I still don’t get it, Q!! I don’t get it one bit!

I’m getting flashbacks to the time Q posted that photoshopped Antifa flag.. Although, that one might have been intentional (false flag? Come on). Moments like this, Q… where you show us something that YOU should know is false, or otherwise breaks some rule or guideline YOU gave us, make even the most hardcore among us doubt.

(It’s not a dealbreaker for me, Q, but it’s putting a lot of stress on our relationship here).

Still, gotta roll with what #QAnon says, and since he’s saying Saddiqi is our target. I’m going to roll with that to the best of my ability. Maybe new information will fill in the gaps in my current understanding – but nothing has done that just yet.

Alright, let’s get into the Qdrops:

Looks like /ourguy/ Rowdy Gowdy has finally been uncaged!

House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy told “Fox News Sunday” that House Speaker Paul Ryan led a meeting Friday night with senior members of the DOJ and FBI, and made it clear that “there’s going to be action on the floor of the House this week if FBI and DOJ do not comply with our subpoena request.”

Republicans have accused the DOJ and FBI of stonewalling and intentionally impeding their investigation, despite the agencies’ claims that fulfilling the request requires a careful review of the sensitive documents.

Gowdy told “Fox News Sunday” that “the full panoply of constitutional weapons available to the people’s house” are on the table, including contempt of Congress.

“I don’t want the drama; I want the documents,” Gowdy added.

I appreciate the sentiments, but can we please choose anons that can type in complete sentences, free of ebonics in the future?

Anyway, it’s telling that they’re lumping Rosenstein and Wray together, when we’ve been told repeatedly to “Trust Wray.” All part of the “movie.”

Okay, Q is claiming the Google photos from the 15th are undeniable proof… but proof of what, exactly?

Uh… maybe I’m missing something, but I’m not sure this provided “undeniable proof” of anything. I can think of lots of scenarios where someone could get on to the Google Campus with something that looks like a visitor pass, and take a picture of a bicycle.

Yeah – we know that #TheCabal had their private little e-mail server, and yeah, if we work off the assumption that Trump now has it in his posession, it’s not hard to see why ES would want to negotiate… but how do the photos connect to that (other than it being Google-related)?

Sorry Q, I’m just not seeing how this constitutes a proof here.

As for sharing what you already know (legally)?

You can declassify, or you can get someone to testify.

Q reiterates his Access Kills post.

I’m sure he’s trying to remind us of his “undeniable proof” – and you all know I’m the number one Q cheerleader here – but I’m still not seeing the connection.

And this is the big post; the one that made me amend my last article. The one I’m still baffled about because to arrive at this conclusion, anons had to ignore Q’s previous instructions.

Really, the only credible thing that’s been found on him so far is this, from one anon:

So, Siddiqi’s father was an arms dealer in Pakistan and London, working with Mika Brzenski’s father, National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski in the 1980’s, on a secret CIA/ISI program called SOVMAT, that involved buying weapons from Eastern Europe and China, through shell corporations.

Anon here theorizes that Obama’s 3-week visit to Karachi in 1981 is the source of the soon-to-be-released AK pic, where he may be shooting either a flag, or an American citizen.

Wow. And here I thought I couldn’t be surprised any more.

Ah, okay, so this is the video clip that “EbonicsAnon” above was trying to reference.

Here’s a clickable link: https://mobile.twitter.com/FoxNews/status/1008357349193539585

Seriously, don’t skip it. Watch it.

If you listen to it, Bartiromo asks Nunes why the Strzok text regarding “stopping Trump” didn’t appear until the IG report, which other texts did. Nunes wants to know why, to, because he’s wondering if higher ups are trying to cover this thing up, or clean it out.

And he’ll get his answer when Horowitz and Wray testify in front of Congress…

TODAY.

Of course, we already have a pretty good idea of what’s going to happen as a result of this, and what that will lead to – the release of an unedited/unredacted IG report – as per the steps Q laid out for us before.


Hear that? #POTUS is talking to you!

Ah, here’s the confirmation:

This is just the beginning.

Though I’m wondering if Q is mentioning Barcelona for a specific reason. Setting up a past to prove a future, so to speak. Wouldn’t be surprised.

But yes, even Europe is starting to wake up. Italy is rejecting migrants and refugees now, which is really, really good because:

And it looks like Frau Merkel herself might be out in a matter of days!

The Cabal’s mad experiment know as the European Project is crashing down, as more countries weigh the benefits and commit to leaving! And it is glorious!

Clickable: https://mobile.twitter.com/KBMAGAFL/status/1008386945905504256

Now… this is a link to a heavily edited speech Obama gave in Belgium some years back.

Here’s the a link to the full speech:

So… Why would Q post a clip that’s so obviously fake?

A lot of anons wondered the same thing, and even took to examining the entire speech in detail, to see if the original was the one that had actually been faked.

Some anons even found digital artifacts in the clip, where it looks like Obama’s hand is missing, and took it as proof that the original had been edited – when in all likelihood, it’s probably just a digital interlacing artifact, resulting from it being loaded and reuploaded everywhere.

So why would Q post a video that’s so obviously fake?

I don’t have an answer. I’m really puzzled by this – although he has uploaded photoshopped images on at least one occasion that I can think of, off the top of my head.

And between this, and him having us ignore his instructions about the facial hair/Hussein Admin before… frankly, I wonder who’s driving the QAnon account over at the NSA these past few days, and if they’re just being sloppy.

While I have no doubt that Obama is evil and subversive, and the clip Q showed us at first is what the actual, intended meaning was to his select Cabal audience members… why try to show this with a fake clip?

Anons were soon informed of a 7 delta between this Qpost and Trump’s Father’s Day tweet.


Hard to prove a negative, Q.

Some anons figured it was something along these lines:

Kinda lame, if you ask me. Seems like a weak connection.

Then again, some people thought he was literally missing a hand, like some kind of Bond villain who forgot to bolt on their spare prosthesis in the morning.

That’s just… no. Come on, guys. It’s a digital artifact. Slow down the video from a higher-quality source. His hand is there the whole time.

No, the best answer I came across was captured in this infographic.

Full size: https://www.neonrevolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/3b16a6486b86ec60b3a6ef0fcdd343f9eb6c8998457a5615ac10accdf8d8dc89.jpg

No crazy decodes necessary. No ciphers. Just plain-old reading-between-the-lines.


Here’s the direct link to the video:

The Q reference lands at about 2:15, and I think the important thing to realize is… this isn’t a compliment.

SNL, though.

Wonder who they’ll send dressed up in a giant Q costume next?

Hey, how about I write a sketch for them in advance? Here, I’ll break out my screenwriting skills!

INT. DARKENED BASEMENT

Two greasy, overweight NECKBEARDS – GARY and KEVIN, sit huddled over their computers, surrounded by empty Mountain Dew bottles (we hope), their dorito-encrusted fingers clacking away on their IBM Model M.

KEVIN

You should totally send that meme to Sandra.

GARY

Nah. She’s a total Stacy. And Stacies only want one thing.

KEVIN and GARY

(simultaneously)

Chads!

They each spit over their shoulders in disgust.

KEVIN

You’re probably better off anyway. I hear she voted for Hillary.

GARY

Yeah, women are mostly Libtarded these days. Probably wants me, a hard-working, redblooded American, to pay for her birth control, too! Why? So she can find more Chads?

Kevin spits again as Gary takes another swig of Mountain Dew.

KEVIN

CHADS!

Gary suddenly sits up! Spits all the Mountain Dew out of his mouth!

GARY

Hey! Hey, look! It’s a new Q post!

KEVIN

A new Q?!

Kevin practically throws his laptop aside, to put his face right up next to Gary’s monitor.

GARY

Look! Look at this! It says... Q desperately needs our help. We have to connect to 168.1...

KEVIN

Hold on, hold on!

Kevin leaps back to retrieve his laptop. Starts typing FURIOUSLY!

GARY

Are you seeing this?!

KEVIN

Give me the next line.

GARY

Okay, you have to... Sudo -k... no, into the other directory! Go back, go back!

SPARKS start to fly out their computers.

KEVIN

(suddenly uncertain)

I don’t know if this is gonna work.

GARY

We have to try! Q needs us! Give me that USB cable!

Kevin tosses him the cable. Gary holds up the connector pin.

The lights on the ceiling dim, as the computers suck down more electricity.

GARY

Ready?

Kevin holds up the other end, still uncertain. Then,

KEVIN

For QAnon.

Gary nods.

GARY

For QAnon.

They plug in the USB cable to both their machines at the same time.

LIGHTNING ARCS between the machines, blowing up the light-bulb above their heads, sending the boys reeling back in a dizzying explosion.

The room goes dark.

And then... A light.

Both Kevin and Gary look up, their eyes and glasses covered in soot.

KEVIN

Did we do it? Did we help Q?

Gary cleans his glasses, before putting them back on his face. His jaw drops. He hits Kevin in the arm. Kevin looks up, and his jaw drops, too.

GARY

Q?

QANON

That’s right! It’s me! Teehee!

Before them stands a beautiful Spanish woman in a blue bikini, the letter Q painted on her glistening abs.

QANON

You two brought me here with your...

(she leans in close)

Computer skills.

KEVIN

We-uh we-uh we-uh, we did?!

QANON

That’s right. And now, you’re going to have to help me.

Both Gary and Kevin leap to their feet! Their excitement is palpable, and they are both eager to “help” in whatever way they can.

QANON

Donal’ Trump isn’t going to be el Presidente forever, joo know. We have been going through the whole internet. Trying to find a zootable successor for him. Because who’s going to come after him when the time comes. Eric?

(Cue uproarious audience laughter).

She starts to circle around the pair, drawing a hand across their shoulders as she sizes the obese neckbeards up.

QANON

Someone who is strong. Intelligent. Witty. Capable. Someone who knows how to put Leftists in their place with a well-placed meme. Someone who...

She leans into Kevin’s ear.

QANON

(whispers)

...watches anime.

Kevin wiggles and jiggles as chills run down his spine.

She suddenly sweeps all the equipment, papers, and empty soda bottles off one of the desks, before sprawling seductively across the surface.

QANON

You must prove yourselves to me! Starting with... the physical test.

GARY

What?! Here?!

KEVIN

Now!?

QANON

Who wants to go first?

Kevin glances at Gary, and Gary glances at Kevin. Like two wild hippopotamuses, the two suddenly break out into a flubbery wrestling match, each trying to reach Q, at the table before the other.

QAnon starts to get turned on by the fighting.

QANON

Yes, that’s right, you bad boys! Tell me how much you hate Hillary!

GARY

OH I HATE HER!

KEVIN

I THINK SHE’S THE DEVIL INCARNATE AND SMELLS LIKE SULFUR!

Qanon lets out a delighted laugh, and rolls around on the desk.

QANON

Who’s the worst President America’s ever had?

KEVIN

OBUMMER!

GARY

WRONG! It’s Johnson! He created the welfare state and the “soft bigotry of low expectations” that gave us Obama! And he killed JFK!

A mirthful laugh ERUPTS from QAnon, when suddenly, the boys hear it.

They FREEZE.

A door opens upstairs.

Their mom calls down.

MOM

Boys? Is everything alright down there?

Kevin and Gary look at each other like deer in headlights.

MOM

Whose voice is that? You better not be looking at those nudie cartoons. I’m coming down there.

As the blood drains from their faces, they both turn to Q, still laughing on the table.

They stampede over to Q, and, in an instant, SQUASH her beneath their girthy backsides.

Q’s muffled screams can’t escape from beneath the rolls of fat.

Mom flicks on the light to see the boys both sitting on the desk, arms crossed, legs folded.

MOM

Is everything alright down here?

GARY

Oh, yeah mom. Just... re-configuring some things down here. You probably heard some feedback. It gets real technical.

A burnt styrofoam panel falls from the ceiling.

MOM

(still suspicious)

Alright. Well... just clean up after yourselves.

GARY

No problem, mom!

KEVIN

Will do, Mrs. Jackson.

Mom marches back up the stairs. The boys wait until they hear the door shut.

The instant they hear it, they both jump to their feet.

Q now lies lifeless, on the desk before them.

KEVIN

Aw crap.

GARY

I think we just killed Q.

KEVIN

Guess we’re not gonna save America after all.

GARY

No...

They stand there in silence for a moment.

GARY

Hey, wanna play some CS:GO?

KEVIN

Cool.

Gary tilt’s Q’s lifeless body onto the floor and places his computer back on the desk.

KEVIN

Hey, uh, what about the body?

GARY

Eh, we’ll get it later.

KEVIN

Cool.

The End, Copyright © Neon Revolt 2018.

Because F*** YOU SNL, THAT’S WHY!

I own this now! No low-hanging fruit for you, you unfunny, subhuman, propaganda machines. Your show should have been put out to pasture years ago, you Second-City-UCB gutter-runoff.

QAnon” is the main character in a far-right fantasy known as “the Storm,” a narrative that was named after an unexplained, off-the-cuff comment made by President Donald Trump in October 2017, onto which fringe trolls like Infowar’s Alex Jones immediately latched. It’s believed to be a harbinger of a coming “coup,” in which Trump would do away with the “deep state” (led, again, by that aforementioned global cabal trying to seize power and simultaneously run a pedophile ring out of a pizza shop in Washington, D.C.) Per RationalWiki:

Soros must have given his buddies at Snopes a nice cash injection, for them to have a brand new algo dedicated to attacking us.

Anyway, this is how I feel about Snopes:

Actually, to be fair, this is the updated version:

Anyway, they got Snopes and SNL here in the anti-Q camp. Real tip-of-the-spear.

This is going to be fun!


It’s gonna be a fun week.


The TLDR of this drop is that in the wake of the founder’s affair, the couple got a divorce. Legal battles ensued in the wake of their divorce for control over the company. The company is now limping along on user donations, but is editorally controlled by a Soros-backed group.

Even though they have a whole article “debunking” this claim:

Guys, this specific meme was incorrect, so the entire claim is false. Snopes says so.

Do you think they’ll update their article with the disclosure about the fact that Poynter is a Soros-op? I mean, Lefties are so honest and have so much integrity, so… of course they will, right?

Right?!

Hey, nice! Q posted this as I’m still writing, so it’s nice to see he liked the same infographic.

No, no! Think of it!

I’m with Anon on this. I don’t understand Strzok’s angle. Presumably, Q is implying that he’ll be released after his testimony, and after Huber’s investigation is over, as will Lisa Page… but… why? How?:

It may get him a lighter sentence, sure, but… Q is saying released.

What could he possibly say that gets him exonerated/released??

Anon here attempts a line-by-line:

The only other interpretation is not that PS and LP will be released, but that their full texts/emails/info will be released. That’s probably the more likely scenario, which would be incredibly damning to The Cabal, no doubt.

But to get more specific about one particular line for a moment – I think the records will start being unsealed after the full IG report is released, and after Horowitz and Wray testify, and after Huber brings some charges to the table. Sort of a three-pronged attack, before they start unloading their bullets (the sealed indictments) into the Cabal.

Anyway, here’s the story Q linked, in which Clowns get purged from the White House.

When the history of Donald Trump’s war with the US intelligence community is written, the name of the conflict’s first casualty is unlikely to be recorded, as the former marine officer is still a serving CIA official.

That marine officer was the CIA’s liaison to the White House, whose duties included bringing relevant White House officials with appropriate security clearance into the loop about covert operations.

According to current and former White House and intelligence officials, he lost a bureaucratic struggle with his nominal boss, the National Security Council’s controversial intelligence director.

Multiple former colleagues described the former CIA liaison as a consummate professional with no history of infractions. But late one afternoon in mid-March, the retired marine was abruptly informed that his services were no longer needed and he ought not to come to work the next day. Co-workers were shocked at a display that seemed designed to humiliate him.

This story, if you keep reading, mentions Ezra Cohen-Watnick – the man with “no face,” (but only because nobody really knows what he looks like).

The liaison’s removal, first reported by the Washington Post, followed a clash with Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the 30-year-old intelligence director on the NSC staff, to whom he reported.

Cohen-Watnick was a junior case officer at the Defense Intelligence Agency, where he caught the eye of Michael Flynn, the ex-DIA director and first national security adviser to Trump. When Flynn came to the White House, Cohen-Watnick was among the Flynn deputies whom career national security staff came to view as a clique – derisively known in intelligence circles as the “Flynnstones”. For their part, the so-called Flynnstones viewed the career staff as Obama loyalists, and excluded many of them from national security decision-making.

This relates back to Qdrop 1126:

In which, you’ll remember, this story is linked:

Ezra was busy busy busy purging the White House of evil influence, before he ended up at the DOJ.

And Anon had an interesting thought about all these moving parts:

And Q makes sure to outline the Alinsky-tactics of numerous times in this drop, which is good because it not only helps prepare us, the QArmy, to see through the #FakeNews stories that are on the horizon, but it also implies that QTeam is ready for whatever the Cabal is about to throw at them.

With McMaster out of the way, Trump moved to bring back Cohen-Watnick, Bloomberg reported Wednesday. Trump “personally ordered the Department of Justice to hire,” Bloomberg says, despite a general policy not to rehire people who were fired.

This order came from the tippy-top!

For the record, it’s Tashina Gauhar he’s looking for.

At the heart of the activity during this critical period is FBI lawyer #1 Tashina “Tash” Gauhar who was on a video conference call with the FBI New York Field Office (NYFO) as the discoveries of hundreds of thousands of Clinton emails were relayed internally to the Mid-Year-Event (MYE) team in DC on September 29th, 2016

Qception.


This… is not a message for us.

This is a message for those Cabal members, lurking on the board. Remember their little lunar-based, spirit-cooking, Matriarchal, neo-Babylonian death/fertility cult? Yeah, this is addressed to them.

The next full moon falls on the 28th.

Something tells me they won’t be spirit cooking that night.

Oh, that’s a good feeling! Sometimes I forget, the Cabal is out there… watching, crying, screaming, freaking out and generally losing their minds with each subsequent Q post.


Hey, if you liked that post, did you know you can now support Neon Revolt with a Gab Subscription, a Crypto donation, or a One-Time Tip?

Just head to https://neonrevolt.com/donations for instructions!

And Thank You! This site can’t happen without your continued support! But rest assured, together, we are changing the course of history!

56 thoughts on “TROLLING IS FUN! (Should I Write for #SNL? Naaaaahhhhh!) #NewQ #QAnon #GreatAwakening

  1. I don’t think Q did confirm that Siddiqi is the guy in the photo. When Q confirms or agrees with a post, he often just posts the number of that post with no comment. In this case, he said, “Track history.” I took that to mean the more research is needed.

  2. I’ve been lookin at what’s missing in Obama’s speech, too, and it’s pretty hard to find, but what’s missing is “We, The People”.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/transcript-president-obama-gives-speech-addressing-europe-russia-on-march-26/2014/03/26/07ae80ae-b503-11e3-b899-20667de76985_story.html?utm_term=.c4e966dc93e7

    “Yes, we believe in democracy, with elections that are free and fair, and independent judiciaries and opposition parties, civil society and uncensored information so that individuals can make their own choices. Yes, we believe in open economies based on free markets and innovation and individual initiative and entrepreneurship and trade and investment that creates a broader prosperity.

    And yes, we believe in human dignity, that every person is created equal — no matter who you are or what you look like or who you love or where you come from. That is what we believe. That’s what makes us strong. And our enduring strength is also reflected in our respect for an international system that protects the rights of both nations and people — a United Nations and a Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international law and the means to enforce those laws.

    But we also know that those rules are not self-executing.

    They depend on people and nations of good will continually affirming them.

    And that’s why Russia’s violation of international law, its assault on Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, must be met with condemnation, not because we’re trying to keep Russia down, but because the principles that have meant so much to Europe and the world must be lifted up.”

    There are subtle yet essential differences between various versions of declaration of human rights, whereby the essential difference is in whether or not the state is above the people.

    Does the state derive it’s power from the consent of the people, or are the people subjects to/of the state??

    I’ve written an article about a/o these differences in history between the French declaration of human rights and the Dutch one:

    http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVersusDivineCommonLaw

    “Also, the declaration itself is significantly different in a few key points compared with the French Masonic/Cabal version.

    The first article of the Dutch version reads:

    All Humans are born with equal Righs and these Natural Rights cannot be taken away from them [i.e. are inalienable].

    The French version:

    Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good.

    Note the difference. The French version basically says that the people are subjugated to the higher good, while the Dutch (Huguenot) version declares the natural rights (as given in the Bible of course) to be inalienable.

    Then the definiton of liberty:

    Liberty is the power deserved by every Human Being to be allowed to do everything which does not disturb others in their Rights; the Nutral determination of Liberty therefore exists in this rule: DO NOT UPON OTHERS THAT WHICH YOU DO NOT WANT TO HAPPEN UPON YOU.

    The French version:

    Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights. These limits can only be determined by law.

    Note the differences. In the French versions, limits to freedom can be determined by (civil, Roman type) law. In other words: freedom can (and WILL) be limited by the government in the French version, where in de Dutch version it is defined along the Biblical concept of “love thy neighbor like thyself”.”

    So, let’s take a look at the current UN version:

    https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html

    “Article 2.

    Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.”

    A person BELONGS to a “country or territory”…

    “Article 7.

    All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.”

    The law comes FIRST….

    And this one is pretty much the kicker:

    “Article 8.

    Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.”

    The Human rights as declared by the UN are GRANTED to us by law, so clearly the people are considered SUBJECTS of the state and are therefore considered SUBORDINATE to the state.

    “Article 29.

    (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
    (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
    (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.”

    Limitations can (and will) be determined by law..
    These rights cannot be exercised if they are not in alignment with “the purposes and principles of the United Nations.”

    Once again, who’s the boss here, the people or the state c.q. the law???

    Compare this to the US declaration of independence:

    “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness—-That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

    “deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed”

    So, then, what about “Russia’s violation of international law, its assault on Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity”??

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_status_referendum,_2014

    “The official result from the Autonomous Republic of Crimea was a 96.77 percent vote for integration of the region into the Russian Federation with an 83.1 percent voter turnout. […] Following the referendum, The Supreme Council of Crimea and Sevastopol City Council declared the independence of the Republic of Crimea from Ukraine and requested to join the Russian Federation. On the same day, Russia recognized the Republic of Crimea as a sovereign state.”

    Hence my conclusion: What’s missing is “We, The People”:

    “it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

  3. I concur with the above poster in that this was not Q confirming. “Track history” isn’t a confirmation it’s a command. A direction. It’s another way of saying LOOK AGAIN.

    Anons get overexcited. 8chan is a bit esoteric but it isn’t completely inaccessible, even for excitable boomerposters.

    You were on target with the other guy, Neon. Ticked all of Qs boxes. I don’t think you should back down on this point. You’re a lot smarter than most anons.

    Thank you for all the hard work you do (so that I don’t have to find time to do it), you’re my only Q resource (once we’re on FB too). I trust you.

  4. “Presumably, Q is implying that he’ll be released after his testimony, and after Huber’s investigation is over, as will Lisa Page… but… why? How?:”

    I guess you’ve already given the answer in the beginning of your article:

    “As for sharing what you already know (legally)?

    You can declassify, or you can get someone to testify.”

    Why are the other agent’s names redacted, but not LP and PS?

    What does this mean for the chances of getting them convicted in court?

  5. The Siddiqi confirmation IS slippery, I agree.
    *Is “Q” saying that his identity is confirmed……now do some follow up research into his history???
    or
    *Is “Q” stating that this man’s history doesn’t match up, but go ahead and continue digging because it will also be relevant???
    The latter would answer Neon’s questions about why “Q” would identify search parameters for the man’s ID only to confirm somebody that fell outside those parameters?
    But that would be a different technique for (de)confirmation than “Q” has ever used before, so why?
    And why do that, and not highlight a post from Anon that has correct identity???

    Questions still afoot, IMO.

  6. This is a multilayer story with many conections and spin offs. At the end “The King” (Antichrist) Satoro-Obama will be “naked”. PURE EVIL.

  7. Hey neon, just want to share my 2 cents on the google op and 5:5. In the past I have heard people explain 5:5 as a military code as to mean “understood”, as in a question that is answered 10:4 if it is understood. Not sure if true, just wanted to share. The google op thing I looked at different. I think the pics were for proof they had team on the ground at google, likely to retrieve Comey emails. The emails they have “access” to after it was released in ig report. Remember, even though Qteam “has it all” they need to attain it through legal avenues to use for prosecuting later. The ig gave them a need to “access”. I have no idea why they can’t just use NSA or MI stuff but there must be legal barriers.

    Keep up the good work and don’t feel bad about taking time between articles, your stuff is worth the wait

  8. Hey Neon,

    Could you give an about tab section on your home screen and also have a tab section of Q confirmation posts. I feel as though it would help the normies understand you and Q better.

    Also could you make it easier to scroll through past article pages? it’s kind of tedious to re-read old articles by clicking every two pages.

    Thank you for the work man. I really appreciate it.

    I always try to remember to pray for our safety and victory. Thank you friend.

  9. Important connect-the-dots article by Sundance regarding Hussein gap in timeline which could possibly tie into the not yet released picture. My other post blocked a few minutes ago? theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/01/10/john-brennan-the-cia-zibgnew-brezinski-columbia-university-and-obama/

  10. What’s missing in Obama’s speech is “We, The People”.

    It’s a bit hard to spot, but there is a subtle yet significant difference between various versions of “human rights” and especially the authority under which these have been established. This is the part of the speech where this comes forth:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/transcript-president-obama-gives-speech-addressing-europe-russia-on-march-26/2014/03/26/07ae80ae-b503-11e3-b899-20667de76985_story.html
    -:-
    “Yes, we believe in democracy, with elections that are free and fair, and independent judiciaries and opposition parties, civil society and uncensored information so that individuals can make their own choices. Yes, we believe in open economies based on free markets and innovation and individual initiative and entrepreneurship and trade and investment that creates a broader prosperity.

    And yes, we believe in human dignity, that every person is created equal — no matter who you are or what you look like or who you love or where you come from. That is what we believe. That’s what makes us strong. And our enduring strength is also reflected in our respect for an international system that protects the rights of both nations and people — a United Nations and a Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international law and the means to enforce those laws.

    But we also know that those rules are not self-executing.

    They depend on people and nations of good will continually affirming them.

    And that’s why Russia’s violation of international law, its assault on Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, must be met with condemnation, not because we’re trying to keep Russia down, but because the principles that have meant so much to Europe and the world must be lifted up.”
    -:-

    The key part is this: “a United Nations and a Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international law and the means to enforce those laws”, which signals an entirely different approach than what is codified in the US constitution. I’ve written an article about a/o these subtle differences in the historic French human rights declaration and the Dutch one:

    http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVersusDivineCommonLaw
    -:-
    There are a few remarkable differences in the wordings compared to the French one and also the symbolism is totally different. Even though at first glance the symbolism appears to be very similar, in reality the details are VERY, VERY different. There is no Jacobinian hat and thera are no fascii.

    Also, the declaration itself is significantly different in a few key points compared with the French Masonic/Cabal version.
    The first article of the Dutch version reads:

    All Humans are born with equal Righs and these Natural Rights cannot be taken away from them [i.e. are inalienable].

    The French version:

    Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good.

    Note the difference. The French version basically says that the people are subjugated to the higher good, while the Dutch (Huguenot) version declares the natural rights (as given in the Bible of course) to be inalienable.

    Then the definiton of liberty:

    Liberty is the power deserved by every Human Being to be allowed to do everything which does not disturb others in their Rights; the Nutral determination of Liberty therefore exists in this rule: DO NOT UPON OTHERS THAT WHICH YOU DO NOT WANT TO HAPPEN UPON YOU.

    The French version:

    Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights. These limits can only be determined by law.

    Note the differences. In the French versions, limits to freedom can be determined by (civil, Roman type) law. In other words: freedom can (and WILL) be limited by the government in the French version, where in de Dutch version it is defined along the Biblical concept of “love thy neighbor like thyself”.

    Then the article about the freedom of religion:

    Every Human has the Right to serve God in such a way as he wants to; without it being possible to be forced therein, in any way.

    The French version:

    No one shall be disquieted on account of his opinions, including his religious views, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.

    Once again, totally different. In the Dutch version, one is essentially bound to God’s highest command, which is: “love thy neighbor like thyself”, while the French version is once again conditional. It can be limited by law, the law determined by the government of course.
    -:-

    When you look at the UN declaration of human rights, you find the same kinds of differences, namely that We, The People are being considered as subjects of the state:

    https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html

    “Article 2.

    Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.”

    A country or territory to which a persong BELONGS…
    And it already specifies the essence of the state a persone BELONGS to: LIMITATION of SOVEREIGNTY.

    “Article 8.

    Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.”

    GRANTED by the constitution or law…. -> you only have these rights because the government gives them to you..

    “Article 29.

    (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
    (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
    (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.”

    Rights are LIMITED by LAW..
    Rights may IN NO CASE be exercised when contrary to the UN. Such as a referendum to establish a new republic, may be?

    Compare this to the US Declaration of independence:

    https://usconstitution.net/declar.html

    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. “

    It is the RIGHT of THE PEOPLE to alter or to abolish it…..

    So, what’s the problem then with “Russia’s violation of international law, its assault on Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, must be met with condemnation”??

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_referendum%2C_2014

    “The official result from the Autonomous Republic of Crimea was a 96.77 percent vote for integration of the region into the Russian Federation with an 83.1 percent voter turnout. […] Following the referendum, The Supreme Council of Crimea and Sevastopol City Council declared the independence of the Republic of Crimea from Ukraine and requested to join the Russian Federation. On the same day, Russia recognized the Republic of Crimea as a sovereign state.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Crimea
    “The Republic of Crimea is a federal subject of Russia that is located on the Crimean Peninsula. “

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_subjects_of_Russia
    “Every federal subject has its own head, a parliament, and a constitutional court. Each federal subject has its own constitution and legislation. Subjects have equal rights in relations with federal government bodies.”

    In the end, this comes down to who’s the ultimate SOVEREIGN in a state or country:

    a) the State itself (UN model);
    b) The People (US constitutional model).

    So, yes, what’s missing is “We, The People”, because if the State considers itself to be above the people, you have exactly what Obama said:

    “This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign.”

    Once again, who is the sovereign?

    The UN, or We, The People?

  11. The mustache in the photo looks photo shopped. Maybe Q meant the man didn’t have facial hair in the original photograph. He just said, “No facial hair.”

  12. i believe “GOOG OP” means that google was ‘infiltrated’ and info was ‘obtained’…?
    just a thought. — another great post, Neon!! thanQ! 😉

  13. Neon you are slipping the Google bike and guest pass aren’t the undeniable proof, what was recovered while there at the ‘Google op ” was where the proof came from Like the draft messages that were never sent but used to communicate, also Maybe that picture of the item in a pallet in a cargo container was the actual server….

  14. I haven’t finished reading, but wanted to throw this out about Bilderberg…
    “Hard to prove a negative, Q.”
    Look at the flags. NO American flag. You wouldn’t notice (maybe) at the beginning, but when they pan out at the end, our flag isn’t anywhere.

    • Not true. The US flag is there, but it’s not prominent as usual. It’s almost buried in a sea of flags.

  15. I don’t see Q’s reply, “track history”, as confirmation of Sadiqqi at all. He was simply telling us to keep digging and look into the history. Neon, I think you were ON POINT with the Vali Nasr connection. It fits perfectly with Q’s rules!!!!

  16. Another great post that helps me keep it straight. As i work full time and am on the downside of 56 helping to take care of my 7 year old grandson, taking care of my 70 yr old hubby, you get the picture, makes it hard to stay on top of Q. So A big THANK YOU for making it easier for me. We all come from different walks of life have different circumstances but it is Amazing to me how Q has United US to be A team, to help each other. So I am so grateful for your humor and logical and easy to read Q Posts.
    ThanQ Neon.

  17. Neon,

    As to the Vali Nasr vs Sohale Siddiqi issue, I seem to remember very early on when Q said “disinformation sometimes necessary.” That may not be the exact quote, but I think you get the gist of it. Heck exact quotes can be tricky for me, I’m 65 years old, so gimme a break. 😉

  18. I agree. Both Nasr and Saddiqi are part of the same story line. There are multiple players all woven into the bigger story line around MB/Pakistan/Iran/US. Q mentioned earlier that VJ/Huma/the Awans would move into the spotlight. Referencing Game of Thrones and how characters and story lines move into the foreground then temporarily recede to advance the overall narrative is how I frame what Q is doing. His drops introduce us to characters and background info that will help understand when a minor plot line becomes prominent. Imho it wasn’t an either/or between Nasr and Siddiqi. Studying both expand our understanding.

  19. The “Siddiqi/Nasr” quandary, is getting people to dig, dig, and dig into another field, to harvest information in an asymmetric fashion. It is showing definite “interesting” people no matter what direction you go (perhaps that was one of the reactions Q was hoping for). I would agree with “Anon” that the mustache in ‘couch’ photo may have been added, just as the turtle neck on O might have been. There’s a lot not right with that photo, from the get-go.

    Snopes is a joke. They will make sure that humdrum, ‘who cares’ information is ‘spot on,’ so that they claim credibility; thus the addition disinformation they spread blends in with some respect. Also, it doesn’t hurt to be propped up by the propagandized, MSM, fake news, so-call journalists, and blogger punditry, who will lend the supreme provenance of citing them. Not too bad for a loser-Leftist, cat lady who operates with such autonomy (you know, this all ends bigly, badly for them all…those note for destruction and downfall in ‘the plan’ aren’t the only baddies who will face ‘justice’).

    Oh, and the SNL skit…
    They have a specialized viewership, so pandering to their audience isn’t anything new. They’re another Leftist media operation that is used for sound bites and talking points the next week; otherwise, I would never even hear of them (haven’t watched that show in 20 years).

    NR, you are doing a great, and much appreciated job! You offer a salient analysis, aren’t afraid to step out on a limb at times, and take full ownership of any missteps. Thank you.

  20. “This is a message for those Cabal members, lurking on the board. Remember their little lunar-based, spirit-cooking, Matriarchal, neo-Babylonian death/fertility cult? Yeah, this is addressed to them.”

    Here’s my chance to mention a bit of something else that was “addressed to them.”

    Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption
    Issued on: December 21, 2017

    I don’t think that the issuance of Trump’s December 21st Executive order on the Winter Solstice was inadvertent.
    It is said that it is always darkest before the dawn. So too with the Winter Solstice when we celebrate the return of the light.

    We recall Trump’s Scottish roots, so we can talk about Yule traditions in Scotland:

    “In some parts of the Scottish Highlands, a variation of the Yule log was observed, here a figure of and old woman, the Cailleach Nollaich, was carved from a withered tree stump. At dusk, the figure was brought into the house and laid upon the burning peat of the house fire. The family would gather round the hearth and watch the figure consumed into ashes, the rest of the evening was spent in games and merriment. The figure, represented, not fertility and life but of the evils of winter and death, the figure had to be totally consumed if misfortune and death were to be averted in the coming year.”
    Source: http://www.thewhitegoddess.co.uk/the_wheel_of_the_year/yule_-_winter_solstice.asp

  21. Neon you are spot on about Nasr but Q cannot confirm that directly. Nasr must have some kind of security clearance which makes it too risky for a direct confirm. ‘Track history’ means to trace back Nasr’s history and that will prove your discovery…you have already done this!!! You are Brilliant!!! Keep up the good work.

  22. Questions in the Socratic method help bring to light false assumptions. Occam’s Razor (most likely answer usually right) helps w answers. We have more than we know. Cabal already knows answers; they are the perps.
    Did any of Plato’s dialogues have characters asking Socrates, “Why are you asking us THAT question, Socrates?” Nope. Speakers went straight ahead into answers, and there cleared up false assumptions and found truth.
    I found the article’s questions, fears and doubts unhelpful. Those are trench thoughts. They will prove irrelevant if we trust the plan. New rules, as that HBO schmuck would say. Correctly identified by you: Mockingbird only works until curtain drawn and “magority” of “magic” exposed.
    Did you see that massive troll when @POTUS held the big gmail logo envelope w NK wnvoy, trolling the draft gmail comms of the “13 angry Democrats” (no name among them) in on the chain. Count em.
    I feel confident Hussein’s college bud’s id wiill be unmasked at the right time, so I’m not going to get into a nirpick w/ General Q over it.
    How could Rosenstein be so stupid not to know POTUS had the original unredacted IG report, rendering his redacted “unredacted” report a fraud? Plus he got grilled abt it for 2.5 hrs at WH last week. THAT must have been something.
    As for SP, honestly, reads like diredting on paper. Not saved by dialogue. My ideal SP:

    INT or EXT stage set
    Dialogue or action.

    Repeat. Like Shakespeare. And Q.

  23. Regarding the video; good points except Obama prefaced it with commenbts making it clear he didn’t approve of those beliefs. I doubt he’d promote anyone’s soveirnity unless it was him. Anyway, I was watching it for continuity flaws and found several. Watch how the sidewall changes throughout the video, seen even in the cuts to people in the audience recording it on their phones. The “cover” is added – that different wall. To easily see it, watch at 2 minutes, then the last 10 seconds. It jumps from wall#1 to wall#2 throughout.

  24. Regarding the Google proof. I took that as a revelation or a proof to the cabal, not us. Mostly, Q Team got PROOF of their crimes thanks to GOOG.

  25. It may be simply be an oversight, but any particular reason why the President misspelled “countries” in his tweet? It should have been “country’s”. Any ideas?

  26. Projection is a psychological defence / defense common with narcissists. Exquisitely sensitive to unconscious shame, narcissists “project” onto others that which induces shame in themselves. Often the “pot calling the kettle black,” completely unjustified accusations, seeming hurt / offended by something innocuous / decent / reasonable, subtly suggesting faults or problems with you that correctly resides with them, etc.

    Q implies the swamp / cabal / deep state actors are highly narcissistic. Narcissism is know to be intergenerational; e.g., coherent with the concept of Satanic bloodlines / malevolent dynastic intermarrying actors. Further implication is that growth of swamp / cabal / deep state is an inevitable subset of general thesis of narcissistic decay of culture in historian Christopher Lasch’s “The Culture of Narcissism.”

    (As a tangent, NR, the Pharisees were quintessential narcissists. We can thus view the ministry of Jesus as having the diametrically opposite nature, one of genuine righteousness and sincere virtue that is devoid of narcissism.)

    Swamp projecting now onto @POTUS has “advantage” that they seed the meme that it will @POTUS who is narcissist / projecting once disclosures start in earnest–they may project that President Trump is projecting.

    I’d love to have a coffee with Q, some time (as if). Have a conceptual thesis rooted in elements of narcissism theory that I suspect can bridge Lasch with Carroll Quigley’s “The Evolution of Civilizations,” Gibbon’s “Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire,” various works critical of feminism (gender narcissistic subset of what Lasch warned about), etc. Sees the Holocaust and abortion writ large as gender narcissistic analogues.

    Whereas I had thought of the thesis as a sort of quantum mechanics for narcissistic social decay pre-Q, I now see the collective machinations of narcissistic actors as the quantum mechanics of narcissistic decay, and the thesis itself as explaining the underlying aetheric / zero-point physics of the decay. Unified Field Theory for Strategic Studies, if you will.

    Cathartic–apology for this minor dissertation; narcissism and society is an area of interest. Appreciate all your excellent work.

    • How many times has Q called them Stupid. Likely causes a lot of foot stamping and fist shaking.

  27. OK, a lot covered in Neon’s post so I’ll just concentrate on one aspect found at the beginning: Documents requested from the DOJ and FBI by Congress. Both these organizations slow rolled the release of requested information, then provided some with major redactions. Some documents even went through major rewrites before being presented (the IG summary report in particular). Congress is supposedly not amused and is now threatening legal action to force compliance. Meanwhile Q constantly informs us they (and POTUS) are in full control, sit back and watch the movie, except when we need to get up and call our Reps to force full release of the IG report.

    Consider that all this is occurring under a system where POTUS is the boss of the entire executive branch of government. When I was in business, if the boss calls and says do something, I don’t get to veto his decision. I can advise not to do it or suggest alternatives, but I do not get to defy him. At least not for long as I would be fired. Making copies of requested documents and delivering them somewhere is not a real tough job. The boss’s order to do this is not tough to understand. Failure to do this is insubordination and the penalty is being fired. This is basic chain of command stuff. All this drama with redactions, incomplete submissions, and delays in providing existing information wastes time. It also shows the boss is not in charge as much as he thinks if this is allowed to go on.

    All this is occurring while we get closer to the mid term primary elections followed by the fall elections. Since this slow rolling information release is going on, none of the items of what the government has actually been doing and how it needs to be changed in the future is being discussed by the candidates. Incumbents are not being asked how they allowed this corruption to occur on their watch, why didn’t they see it and do something, why should you be reelected to fix something you missed the first time around? Besides writing laws, Congress is supposed to see the laws are enforced. Pumping out tens of thousands of pages of the former and doing nothing of the latter is flat out unacceptable. I could go on but you get the basic idea I’m sure.

    And speaking of elections, the last one (plus many before) occurred with massive voter fraud. Have the voter rolls in all the states been purged yet? Have the basic ballot methods been cleaned up to eliminate fraud? POTUS rightly identified this as a major threat to the Republic, put Homeland Security in charge of getting it fixed, before the elections I assumed. But as far as I know the voter rolls have not been verified, election officials in many areas have defied requests for information on the rolls and election equipment has not been replaced to guarantee an accurate poll. Have I totally missed the slate of reform candidates at the national, state and local levels that should be running? Or are we about to get another round, same as the last round, of elections of dubious validity by an electorate propagandized by major media shills?

    Rant off, for now. Thanks for listening.

    Off topic: Neon, how about considering opening a thread now and then for general discussion of items and threats the government should be addressing? While the various power groups are vying for control, real threats are not being addressed, in some cases not even widely known as threats that need action starting now. Lionel Nation puts out a piece now and then on a number of open issues with action pending. Perhaps you could open threads with unaddressed threats as a theme?

  28. I am thinking that Hillary’s many worsening health issues may have something to do with the “panic” that Q is talking about. Her knowing exactly what she has done, and not knowing when all this is going to hit the fan is obviously taking a toll.

    Obama’s openness is a sign of how close they all thought they were to the completion of a NWO. Bush or Clinton were supposed to be our choices. Either way, the NWO was set.

  29. Great job as always NR! I loved your script it reminded me of one of my favorite movies from the 80’s Weird Science!

  30. I know Q says to trust Wray and Horowitz but I will never trust those 2 because they constantly lied even under oath at those hearings today, in addition to the false statements they made about no bias on Strzok’s part over the IG reports. Another important thing to consider… If a guy like Jeffrey Epstein can walk free on a plea deal, so will Strzok, Page, Comey, Lynch, Clinton, Obama and all the rest. Our Justice System has now become the Plea Deal System, so forget about any mass arrests of crooked Dems and CIA/FBI agents. It seems like Neon is even starting to question a lot of loose ends that Q’s story doesn’t seem to make sense of, so hope for the best but don’t expect too much in the way of true justice.

  31. Sorry, Neon. I used the wrong user ID on my previous post which is probably why you didn’t approve it.

  32. Google bike pic proves Q Team was on campus, tell Sergei and Larry they know that they setup a dedicated comms server for Hussein to comm off-grid, except Q now has all the emails. Eric Schmidt thinks he has power.Remember AI is just statistics and math, nothing special. Goog saves everything. almost as much as NSA, data sharinf for sure, except NSA purged all the the cabal comms. NK server may hold it all….Q asked for a copy of cabal comms or else ES has issues

    • Supposedly that’s the one pic of him that exists publicly, yes. Thus, the “quotation marks.”

  33. I think Release is being free from Cabal control. They are cooperating so maybe a witness protection type deal? In the spirit world if you have an entity parasite, the removal is a release for both physical and non physical beings (demons are dissipated with love & light)

    Also, I think there’s more to PS & LP knowledge because there’s a day of texts missing & a meeting in McCabes office that has a lot of inconsistencies.

    From the article with Sessions about Cohen-Watnick worked at Oracle during the leave from White House employment. Idk what was learned, just thought it to be an interesting tidbit.

  34. TakeBackOurRepublic (above) has an amazing link about Obama’s student years. He went to Pakistan with 3 paki friends (1981) and disapeared from the face of the Earth for 1.5 years. Apeared at Collumbia Uni at the fall of 1982. But no wriiten papers no records about him at the Uni.It looks like his uni degree is a fraud. Did the muslims brothers hired Obama long time ago?

  35. There’s a 3rd way to get undeniable proof legally besides testimony and declassification, and that is discovery.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: