#Anons Discover the Identity of [P] #QAnon

#Anons Discover the Identity of [P] #QAnon

[P] is the symbol #QAnon has used to talk about the cabal heads who 1) not only put #Soros in power, but 2) allowed him to replace the #Rockefellers and 3) give him marching orders.

Anons have collectively reasoned that, as it stands, [P] is most likely #LeCircle, formerly the #Pinay Circle.

If this is the first time you’re hearing the name, think Bilderberg, but smaller, more secretive, and with more royal bloodlines.

In bringing this to you, I’ll add that I’m in perfect mental health, and have no suicidal inclinations whatsoever.

More: https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Le_Cercle

4 thoughts on “#Anons Discover the Identity of [P] #QAnon

  1. Konrad Adenauer may have been in the group, but his C.V. belies any claim that he was a bad guy.
    Look him up; there are few men, if any, currently alive who are worthy of being his butler.

  2. Adenauer is/was a member of the Knights of Malta and was a staunch Catholic. So there is a connection to the Vatican. He even got several honours from the Vatican. But he was imprisoned by the Nazis.

    It seems the Nazis were in league with the Vatican but they also killed the Jesuits. Yes the Nazis persecuted and killed Jesuits and Freemasons.

    Q hinted that the deeper we go the more it looks like a conspiracy theory.

    I am going out on a limb. What if Hitler was a good guy and was infiltrated by the Cabal. The largest chunk of the Cabal are jews. And the Nazis are the biggest boogeyman to date.

  3. Le Cercle smacks of the “Maynard Consortium” which is referenced in Tom DeLonge’s book, Sekret Machines… a very secretive and international group where billions of dollars/pounds/etc. were made, moved and used for various enterprises. Sound familiar? I don’t know how many other people (Anons, Autists) out there have read this book (which is laced with facts but also very potentially intended for disinformation purposes from high ranking SSP-MIC members) and then connect the dots to Le Cercle as a parallel. After digging into this older article by Neon and recalling the book, it would seem very easy to view the two groups as being one in the same or at the very least, the inspiration for the group in the book. Anyone have any thoughts about this they’d like to share?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: